It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
How much do we really know about how people read news websites? We can track their behavior clicking through a site visit. We can collect personal information. We can ask them questions. But that presents a small part of the full picture. To get the rest, we need to climb inside their heads and look through their eyes as they view online news sites -- to peer into their minds and see patterns that even they don't consciously see.
It wasn't a typical monitor, though. Current-generation eyetrackers put a small video camera below the screen, which is calibrated and locked on to the test subject's gaze. As long as the person's head doesn't move outside of the camera's field of view (a region of space about a cubic foot -- more than enough leeway for typical usage), the eyetracker stays on target throughout the session.
The technology has gotten so good that today there exists eyetracking equipment that can use a telephoto lens and track a stationary person's gaze from 20 feet away. (We didn't use such equipment for Eyetrack III.)
Originally posted by webvida
By tracking where people move their eyes when looking at Web sites, researchers offer new information about how to use your Web page real estate.
[...]
What do you think about this? Do any of you have more information on hidden embedded cameras in appliances and stuff?
Originally posted by MrJingles
They don't need to slip this stuff into appliances, how would they use it anyway?
Originally posted by 0951
Originally posted by webvida
By tracking where people move their eyes when looking at Web sites, researchers offer new information about how to use your Web page real estate.
[...]
What do you think about this? Do any of you have more information on hidden embedded cameras in appliances and stuff?
I did read something kinda similar, but this was about using the position of the users mouse in the same way - basically to analyse (I love that word, but only because of the schoolboy humour it affords in sensible publications, anyway...) to analyse how the user viewed the page.
I'll see if I can reference it as it's a rubbish reply otherwise.
(I'm tempted to say it may have been on wired.com, but that's only a guess).
Originally posted by Aether
I don't know. If the user doesn't have a stable fast connection, the feed from the camera is going to be laggy. Even if you do have a fast connection you know will notice their is lag or the picture becomes choppy this would def ruin the experiment. Even with that, the camera would have to have a connection set up to this person's website so if you had something like SP2 installed, theres no way this could be possible. Come to think of it, i'm not sure if they can even make cameras that can track eye focus in real time. The eye moves to fast, and once the size of your pupil changes your focus would change, the camera would have to adjust to this...i'm not buying this...Another thing i thought of...the size of your monitor...the curvature of your monitor..im def not buying this.
[edit on 7-10-2004 by Aether]
Lot of only zeroes or ones so compressios works well, also browser caches page contents so if you downloaded it before so after that browser really won't download it, just opens file from HD.
Originally posted by webvida
But you know what? I was downloading some software and all of a sudden my download speed lept to 300kb per sec - I know sounds BS, but I swear it is true, the file was around 1.5 mb and it only took a few seconds to download - I don't even get nearly this rate with adsl ...