It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sinohptik
Another is that many who claim such a term also claim to have destroyed the ego, which is the only thing that can become "enlightened." It seems it indicates how we truly can deceive ourselves. Especially when one starts to claim that others are not experiencing "it."
Originally posted by TheSubversiveOne
Originally posted by apushforenlightment
Originally posted by TheSubversiveOne
If enlightenment consists of going to an internet forum and claiming one is enlightened, then there are many enlightened being here on ATS. I would wager, that in real life, a true enlightened person wouldn't even need a computer. I would also wager that if anyone knew anything about enlightenment, it would be the enlightened, and not the folks who make such claims on an internet forum.
OP, you have spoken more truth than anyone who's disagreed with you—simply because you haven't yet lied to yourself. Don't allow yourself to be seduced or you justify their actions.
We all have our own paths we need to walk and this place is a perfect place to talk to people who seem to be a bit ahead of the others in evolution/understanding. I wish I lived in a place where all the people around me knew more than me. That would have been easier to understand things and feel more harmonious with the people around me.
Your post is pushing the op towards not seeking enlightment and opening chakras and trying to understand nonduality that is both in buddism/hinduism/native american religon and Jesus teaching. Your post seem to be to the op to not belive anything or seek any more knowledge and remain unchanged. If one of us knows what we are talking about then not seeking further is ignorant. If none of ous is not what we say then he will gain knowledge in philosophy and relax in meditiation so what is the problem of following our advice. You are preaching divide and conqurer mentality and that leeds to duality.
Don't be so overdramatic. I am not preaching anything, I am stating my opinion. If it affected you in away way, maybe you should take a long stare in the mirror and ask yourself why.
Originally posted by sinohptik
reply to post by BlueMule
I was not looking for answers or teaching, I was looking to explore your perspective.
Originally posted by apushforenlightment
Originally posted by TheSubversiveOne
Originally posted by apushforenlightment
Originally posted by TheSubversiveOne
If enlightenment consists of going to an internet forum and claiming one is enlightened, then there are many enlightened being here on ATS. I would wager, that in real life, a true enlightened person wouldn't even need a computer. I would also wager that if anyone knew anything about enlightenment, it would be the enlightened, and not the folks who make such claims on an internet forum.
OP, you have spoken more truth than anyone who's disagreed with you—simply because you haven't yet lied to yourself. Don't allow yourself to be seduced or you justify their actions.
We all have our own paths we need to walk and this place is a perfect place to talk to people who seem to be a bit ahead of the others in evolution/understanding. I wish I lived in a place where all the people around me knew more than me. That would have been easier to understand things and feel more harmonious with the people around me.
Your post is pushing the op towards not seeking enlightment and opening chakras and trying to understand nonduality that is both in buddism/hinduism/native american religon and Jesus teaching. Your post seem to be to the op to not belive anything or seek any more knowledge and remain unchanged. If one of us knows what we are talking about then not seeking further is ignorant. If none of ous is not what we say then he will gain knowledge in philosophy and relax in meditiation so what is the problem of following our advice. You are preaching divide and conqurer mentality and that leeds to duality.
Don't be so overdramatic. I am not preaching anything, I am stating my opinion. If it affected you in away way, maybe you should take a long stare in the mirror and ask yourself why.
You are right you are getting to me. You made my point in that being one (nondual) with people with your perspective is hard.
Originally posted by TheSubversiveOne
I can only rely on my logic is such matters, not my hopes and wishes. And oneness has too many contradictions and fallacies to be logically sound.
Originally posted by BlueMule
Originally posted by TheSubversiveOne
I can only rely on my logic is such matters, not my hopes and wishes. And oneness has too many contradictions and fallacies to be logically sound.
That's what your ego-self wants you to think. There is more than logic that you could rely on, but in order to reach past logic your ego-self has to die and be reborn, like a Phoenix rising from its ashes. That is exactly what the ego-self tries to stop you from bringing about.
So it presents you with logic and rational explanations and obstacles, just like how in The Truman Show all the actors tried to prevent Truman from realizing the truth of his existence.
edit on 7-7-2012 by BlueMule because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TheSubversiveOne
Or maybe it's the other way around. And what you say is what your ego-self wants you to think. Maybe your ego-self makes you think you're actually killing it to be reborn, but it stays the same. So it presents you with a will to not use logic in order to withhold you from realizing this vicious cycle.
Originally posted by sinohptik
reply to post by TheSubversiveOne
"That which we speak most fervently tends to be directed towards ourselves."
Always liked that saying.. The application towards preachers is profound. "You must do it this way!" Well, they are only speaking for themselves, as we all do.
Though, I do not necessarily disagree with "oneness" being a logical perspective, though I do not seem to perceive it in the same way as most of its proponents. I like that though. Shows how encompassing the boundaries of the human context are, and I truly do find beauty in the diversity.
I like to think of it in terms of the human body. It has many individual parts that make up the whole. They all have an effect on one another, and are symbiotic to a degree. Some may see them as separate, but it doesnt seem to change the idea that they all have a distinct effect on one another.
The typical view on "oneness" is that it can be contained within ONE part of the whole. That is, the individual perspective that is perceiving it. Most will not account for a disagreeing viewpoint, simply because it doesnt make sense from ones perspective. And yet, the disagreement is part of What Is by virtue of it existing. What is the Path for one part may not be the same as another part. The heart and lungs both have different needs, movements, and purposes. But look at how often the "lungs" try to tell the heart that it is "doing it wrong" (speaking metaphorically).
For myself, I put this into practice by understanding it in my own body. My mind was essentially controlling how I viewed all other systems contained within myself. Note that I look at the mind as distinct from the brain, though a product of it. I noticed that when doing breathing exercises, I was thinking about how I was breathing, rather than simply breathing. My lungs had their own way of "viewing the world," and my thoughts were stifling this valid viewpoint. I realized that I was relegating myself to just one part of myself. Even if such consciousness stops at the brain, I saw value in experiencing all that "life" has to offer in this way.
"I" existed solely in my thoughts, and yet there were all these systems that seemed to do just fine even when I did not think of them. This led me to logically conclude that I was willfully limiting myself to a small part of my being. Even if nothing existed beyond my brain, "things" most certainly did beyond my thoughts of them. In saying all of this, of course, these words are all products of thought. My heart and lungs et. al. could not care less
As always, I only speak for myself
Originally posted by BlueMule
Originally posted by TheSubversiveOne
Or maybe it's the other way around. And what you say is what your ego-self wants you to think. Maybe your ego-self makes you think you're actually killing it to be reborn, but it stays the same. So it presents you with a will to not use logic in order to withhold you from realizing this vicious cycle.
Learn the ways of mysticism / transpersonal psychology so that you can undergo ego-death... and then come back and say that. I dare you.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by The X
Would you be able to tell if someone who said they were, was or was not Enlightened?.
How would you deduce if they were being truthful?, Just because a person says they are, does not mean they are not.
I praised the OP for his humility. Humility is an important part of enlightenment, don't you agree?