It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Two Russian strategic nuclear bombers entered the U.S. air defense zone near the Pacific coast on Wednesday and were met by U.S. interceptor jets, defense officials told the Free Beacon.
It was the second time Moscow dispatched nuclear-capable bombers into the 200-mile zone surrounding U.S. territory in the past two weeks.
An earlier intrusion by two Tu-95 Bear H bombers took place near Alaska as part of arctic war games that a Russian military spokesman said included simulated attacks on “enemy” air defenses and strategic facilities.
A defense official said the Pacific coast intrusion came close to the U.S. coast but did not enter the 12-mile area that the U.S. military considers sovereign airspace.
The US Air Force's decision to terminate the EB-52 stand-off jammer concept for a second time deals a new blow to the US electronic warfare community.
Maj Scott Fisher, an electronic warfare modernisation requirements officer for Air Combat Command, confirms that funding for the revived EB-52 core component jammer (CCJ) effort has been removed this year from long-term spending plans.
The idea of equipping a subset of the Boeing B-52 bomber fleet with high-power, wing-tip jamming pods has been pursued for almost a decade. A 2002 study by the USAF identified the need for a "systems of systems" airborne electronic attack architecture, with the EB-52 as the centrepiece.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Actually no it didn't. I know all about the EB-52 used in the book. The Stand Off Jammer was eliminated from the budget, then brought back, then eliminated again. It never flew, and it's never going to.
The US Air Force's decision to terminate the EB-52 stand-off jammer concept for a second time deals a new blow to the US electronic warfare community.
Maj Scott Fisher, an electronic warfare modernisation requirements officer for Air Combat Command, confirms that funding for the revived EB-52 core component jammer (CCJ) effort has been removed this year from long-term spending plans.
The idea of equipping a subset of the Boeing B-52 bomber fleet with high-power, wing-tip jamming pods has been pursued for almost a decade. A 2002 study by the USAF identified the need for a "systems of systems" airborne electronic attack architecture, with the EB-52 as the centrepiece.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to post by Xcathdra
Congress pushed for it to be brought back against the Air Force's wishes, so they revived it in 2007, but costs kept going up, so they killed it again after two years. There are currently no plans to build either a new platform, or convert any B-52s. The only jamming platform that may be in use is the EC-130, and I believe the program that has USAF pilots flying EA-6Bs is still in effect.
Originally posted by nostromo85
This actually happens far more often then you think, they're not doing it because of war games or sabre rattling, they're just testing the U.S. (and the U.K. & Norway) defence zones, it's good practise for the crew on the bombers and for the air defence zones. And well... if Russia find a weekness, then its all good for them, too.
It's amazing that they're still using the TU-95's