It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by camaro68ss
Originally posted by habitforming
reply to post by camaro68ss
Here in America, many of us speak English.
Amend is an English word meaning "to change."
The bill was changed, was it not?
Ive already addressed this.
Originally posted by habitforming
Originally posted by camaro68ss
Originally posted by habitforming
reply to post by camaro68ss
Here in America, many of us speak English.
Amend is an English word meaning "to change."
The bill was changed, was it not?
Ive already addressed this.
You got the wrong address.
I read your post. What it basically says is that this is not an amendment because the whole thing was changed.
Uh huh....and?
Amend means to change. You mean to tell me it is not a change because it was changed?
Originally posted by camaro68ss
First off I’m waiting for outkasters omission of being wrong. But I know we will never get that because he is so far in the L vs R paradigm and to proud.
Second. Yes, amendment means to change. Does it mean to change a bill 100%, call it a different name, and force feed it down the Americans throats? I don’t know.
It’s up to the SCOTUS to determine that. If that’s the case, then the rules of separations of powers is thrown out the door. No need to have a senate and house anymore. They should join as one.
Do you think its ok to “hijack” a bill, change it 100% and call it an amendment? I don’t, I call it a new bill. What do you say?
Don’t answer that, I already know your answer. “ O-ba-ma, O-ba-ma, O-ba-ma… Hope and change, hope and change. Move forward! Comrades!
Originally posted by camaro68ss
No I don't know where they already ruled on "that" your going to have to show me