It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Economic researchers at Yale managed to successfully train Capuchin monkeys to understand and use currency. The result? The monkeys used their newfound currency to buy sex:
Originally posted by LightningStrikesHere
Not sure if this is Science , but i am guess its in the name of it ! Mods if i have posted in the wrong area please do what thow wilt !
so here it is , i found this to be very interesting
Economic researchers at Yale managed to successfully train Capuchin monkeys to understand and use currency. The result? The monkeys used their newfound currency to buy sex:
some thoughts ?
www.outsidethebeltway.com...
Originally posted by LightningStrikesHere
The result? The monkeys used their newfound currency to buy sex:
well unless there is a capuchin monkey corner shop in their little compound where they can buy beer, cigarettes, a newspaper, and fruit, what else would a capuchin WANT to buy?
Originally posted by BagBing
Dominique Strauss-Kahn, Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund, used to do the same.
I bet the monkeys could handle the economy better...
Originally posted by cranspace
reply to post by LightningStrikesHere
So there is a monkey redlight distict and mokey hoes
And i always thought that monkeys would fight each other and the winner was the one getting the sex
Cran
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
Now we know the reason that the world's oldest profession is the world's oldest profession
Originally posted by R3KR
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
Now we know the reason that the world's oldest profession is the world's oldest profession
This is actually a pretty deep thought. We are teaching them things and seeing our selves. We laugh at how stupid they act but we fail to look in the mirror! Whats next up... teaching them to elect a leader and vote ?
some thoughts ?
The hypothesis is intended to explain two different phenomena: the advantage of sexual reproduction at the level of individuals, and the constant evolutionary arms race between competing species. In the first (microevolutionary) version, by making every individual an experiment when mixing mother's and father's genes, sexual reproduction may allow a species to evolve quickly just to hold onto the ecological niche that it already occupies in the ecosystem. In the second (macroevolutionary) version, the probability of extinction for groups (usually families) of organisms is hypothesized to be constant within the group and random among groups. Its counterpart is the Court Jester Hypothesis, which proposes that macroevolution is driven mostly by abiotic events and forces.
Toward the end of the book Ridley argues that human intelligence is largely a result of sexual selection. He argues that human intelligence far outstrips any survivalist demands that would have been placed on our hominid ancestors, and analogizes human intelligence to the peacock's tail, a trait widely believed to be the result of sexual selection. Human intelligence, he suggests, is used primarily to attract mates through prodigious displays of wit, charm, inventiveness, and individuality. This view of Intelligence is treated at length in Geoffrey Miller's The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature (2001)
Really? A picture of a money's butt is against T&C?
Originally posted by john_bmth
Click here for more information.