It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Bob88
Bout Time, my favorite neo-lib, where have you been?
I don't know if I'd call a 15 year a 'child' per se.
And actually, they're typically called 'homocide bombers'
Originally posted by 10DeadInside10
I'll give my example again, let's say a 12 year old kid came into your house one day and murdered all of your family, your mom and dad, everyone. THEN would you feel remorse for having the kid be locked away for murdering your family? There's a reason why those "kids" are there in Camp X-Ray, it isn't like the U.S. soldiers just picked any kid at random from Afghanistan.
Originally posted by CoLD aNGeR
Let me see, if there is a kid of 12 years old with a weapon and with willing of killing my family this can´t be done by the child itself or thought by him, it´s obvious that he is following direct orders, anyway imagine that the boss that holds that child to tell him afterwards to kill my family, does the same with 20 childs more, so in the same day 20 childs are killing entire families, Who is responsable?
The child being told? or the person who is providing with
info, weapons and orders to the child?
One better question, why kill the child, there is going to be 19 more anyway killing more,
U have to get his boss!!
here is no reason to hold a person below 18 years old in a military camp...
And less reason to try to defend the statements of hold childs for good purposes...