It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheCelestialHuman
I enjoyed the little cartoons.. However, saying that it all came from god, only puts the question back one step further and accomplishes nothing.. Where did this creator come from? Who created the creator, and who created that creator. You end up with an infinite regression of the same questions.
Originally posted by jeramie
Originally posted by TheCelestialHuman
I enjoyed the little cartoons.. However, saying that it all came from god, only puts the question back one step further and accomplishes nothing.. Where did this creator come from? Who created the creator, and who created that creator. You end up with an infinite regression of the same questions.
Apply that chain of reasoning to the other side of the argument. Where were the first molecules floating at which created the big bang? How did they come into existence? What was around before they came into existence? Whatever was around before that, where did it come from?
There has to be some end point, some absolute pinnacle, to which everything can be connected which had no predecessor of any kind, no matter what kind of belief one holds. To me, it is more wonderful to know that God is that pinnacle. He is the origin of EVERYTHING.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by edmc^2
How did a “goat herder” (as you referred to) get the facts right?
How did he knew that the universe (heavens) and the earth had a beginning whereas these scientific facts were known just recently (1900s)?
How could a man 3500 years ago be able say, write what science just recently discovered?
If these ancient writings are what you say they are - "ancient superstition", how in the world did the writer knew what we know now?
In short where did the information come from?
1) That "goat herder" got tons of facts demonstrably wrong
2) Given that no explanation of why he (more like "they") thought it had a beginning, we don't know...a guess? Either way, the universe as we know it had a beginning, but given that we don't know what was before it (or what happened in the first split seconds after the big bang), saying "everything had a beginning can't be proven.
3) The bible has hundreds of things demonstrably wrong when it comes to science...and given the amount of stuff in there it's no wonder that they got the occasional thing right
4) Clearly the writer (again, more than one) got so much wrong and never provides any objective evidence for his claims that I don't get why you are so surprised.
5) Lucky guesses, superstition, ...
Again, what about the hundreds of cases where the bible is scientifically wrong?
Harry Potter gets some stuff right too, doesn't mean you can therefore ride on brooms
edit on 20-8-2012 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)
By the way, since we are doing questions now:
Present us with one example where there's positive objective (!!!) evidence that some sort of higher being created anything. No stupid philosophy arguments, real scientific evidence is what I'm after...
Originally posted by edmc^2
The "factually accurate" event I'm talking about is the beginning of the Universe and the earth.
The Big Bang Theory, The Singularity!
Do you doubt this event?
I'm curious to know.
I can name some more but let's stick to the "Big Bang/Singularity" for the moment.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by ImaFungi
You can't prove a negative. Fact is, there's ZERO objective evidence that a creator even exists, so pretending he/she/it is a fact is silly...and a prime example of God of the gaps.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by ImaFungi
It doesn't matter what they believe given the ABSOLUTE lack of objective evidence proving their claims. The "God did it" track record is awful! In the past people attributed floods or lightning to God because they didn't understand it...but they were clearly wrong.
I'd like to think that in the 21st century we can finally stop filling gaps in knowledge with magic...especially given that the "god did it" argument lacks any real objective evidence.
Originally posted by ImaFungi
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by ImaFungi
It doesn't matter what they believe given the ABSOLUTE lack of objective evidence proving their claims. The "God did it" track record is awful! In the past people attributed floods or lightning to God because they didn't understand it...but they were clearly wrong.
I'd like to think that in the 21st century we can finally stop filling gaps in knowledge with magic...especially given that the "god did it" argument lacks any real objective evidence.
Ohh now i see.... you were arguing against your own interpretation of god.... If you look back at my side of the "argument".. you will note that i dont mention man,, his religion, his attributions, his beliefs,, or anything,,, only the fact that a universe exists,, and so that leads to me believe ( especially with how it is established and what it is capable of, its all around impressiveness) that "something" which I do not know, nor am worthy enough to give attributes,, may have intended to create the universe...
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by ImaFungi
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by ImaFungi
It doesn't matter what they believe given the ABSOLUTE lack of objective evidence proving their claims. The "God did it" track record is awful! In the past people attributed floods or lightning to God because they didn't understand it...but they were clearly wrong.
I'd like to think that in the 21st century we can finally stop filling gaps in knowledge with magic...especially given that the "god did it" argument lacks any real objective evidence.
Ohh now i see.... you were arguing against your own interpretation of god.... If you look back at my side of the "argument".. you will note that i dont mention man,, his religion, his attributions, his beliefs,, or anything,,, only the fact that a universe exists,, and so that leads to me believe ( especially with how it is established and what it is capable of, its all around impressiveness) that "something" which I do not know, nor am worthy enough to give attributes,, may have intended to create the universe...
Doesn't change the FACT that you attribute it to some intelligence while providing ZERO objective evidence to prove that claim
Originally posted by ImaFungi
reply to post by MrXYZ
If It turns out there is an intelligent creator of this universe.... lets pretend there is for a fact,.,..
that doesnt change anything for us in regards to perceiving the physical universe,, it still is as it is,,,
so knowing exactly how the universe is ( and according to this thought experiment, knowing that a creator did create the universe) how would you expect me to objectively prove to you the creator did create it? because as I see it,, this is what you are asking me to doedit on 21-8-2012 by ImaFungi because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by ImaFungi
reply to post by MrXYZ
If It turns out there is an intelligent creator of this universe.... lets pretend there is for a fact,.,..
that doesnt change anything for us in regards to perceiving the physical universe,, it still is as it is,,,
so knowing exactly how the universe is ( and according to this thought experiment, knowing that a creator did create the universe) how would you expect me to objectively prove to you the creator did create it? because as I see it,, this is what you are asking me to doedit on 21-8-2012 by ImaFungi because: (no reason given)
But again, why are you trying to fill a gap in knowledge with magic? You have zero objective evidence to prove your claim, just like the guys who claimed God is responsible for floods.
At least the scientists studying abiogenesis are conducting real experiments looking for evidence. Your argument on the other hand is based on the God of the gaps, the argument from complexity, and "well, it MIGHT be possible".
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by ImaFungi
As long as you don't pretend your BELIEF is fact or somehow proven that's not a problem...
Originally posted by ImaFungi
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by ImaFungi
As long as you don't pretend your BELIEF is fact or somehow proven that's not a problem...
As long as you don't pretend your BELIEF ( there is no god) is fact or somehow proven that's not a problem...edit on 21-8-2012 by ImaFungi because: (no reason given)