It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A bill passed by Congress and signed into law last New Year's Eveby President Barack Obama has united the extreme right and the extreme left in this country.
The American Civil Liberties Union calls it dangerous, the Tea Party calls it an attack on freedom, and journalists are even suing the president over the National Defense and Authorization Act.
The vote was overwhelmingly in favor of the military spending bill; it was like most big spending bills, vital to the continued day to day operation of the armed forces.
But this one contained some provisions that scare people who rarely see the same side of any political issue.
"This scares the living beJesus out of me," said Ed Mahoney who considers himself a constitutional libertarian. He's no fan of the ACLU- but on this issue they agree.
The ACLU says NDAA could permit any president to send the American military to imprison people anywhere in the world, even where there is no armed conflict and no threat to Americans.
Tucked away among 500 pages of spending authorizations is a provision that authorizes the military under the president to indefinitely detain anyone suspected of terrorism, even if they're not charged.
"This is codifying or writing into law power already claimed by the president, said MSU political scientist Dr. Kevin Pybas.
In other words President Obama has already been doing this. But so had President George W. Bush at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. But this act allows for Americans not on the battlefield to also be detained without charge.
Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by stanguilles7
I agree it's not the best article for getting a good sample of opinions but I do think the over all opinion of a large number of groups is that the NDAA is bad for us.
Most of those in the House who identify as 'Tea Party' voted FOR NDAA.
Originally posted by Kali74
In fact I think it would be prudent to fire the entire Congress (every seat up for election) and send a loud clear message that we're done with their Bull...but that's getting off topic.