It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
the information that gathers with each instant occurrence of "now" is permanent, and will always remain as physically existent. In fact, this permanence is what establishes "natural law", contextual ramification, contextual precedence, and ultimately physical Identity itself.
Hell, even your self assurance that you have no actual Identity is part of your inimitable Identity. Ironic, isn't it?
Originally posted by LifeIsEnergy
reply to post by NorEaster
Your whole premise stands upon the notion that there is an observer who is separate from the observed, which just cannot work.
the information that gathers with each instant occurrence of "now" is permanent, and will always remain as physically existent. In fact, this permanence is what establishes "natural law", contextual ramification, contextual precedence, and ultimately physical Identity itself.
Hell, even your self assurance that you have no actual Identity is part of your inimitable Identity. Ironic, isn't it?
I really don't know what to say. First, you have divided "now" into fragmented occurrences. Second, your belief that "natural law" has any "permanency" is beyond me. Third, your whole "Identity" spiel makes no sense whatsoever. If there is no identity then there is no "self assurance", much less is there the construct of identity within no-identity.
Maybe you could clarify further?edit on 19-5-2012 by LifeIsEnergy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by LifeIsEnergy
reply to post by NorEaster
Your whole premise stands upon the notion that there is an observer who is separate from the observed, which just cannot work.
the information that gathers with each instant occurrence of "now" is permanent, and will always remain as physically existent. In fact, this permanence is what establishes "natural law", contextual ramification, contextual precedence, and ultimately physical Identity itself.
Hell, even your self assurance that you have no actual Identity is part of your inimitable Identity. Ironic, isn't it?
I really don't know what to say. First, you have divided "now" into fragmented occurrences. Second, your belief that "natural law" has any "permanency" is beyond me. Third, your whole "Identity" spiel makes no sense whatsoever. If there is no identity then there is no "self assurance", much less is there the construct of identity within no-identity.
Maybe you could clarify further?edit on 19-5-2012 by LifeIsEnergy because: (no reason given)
You've created a computer program of the universe that you can watch on the monitor. Having gone to work for eight hours, when you return home you want to see what the program has been doing while you've been away. You are able to print out all the events that had occurred for those eight hours (even though those events have already passed and is no longer on your monitor), and you can do this because all of the information has been stored in your computer.
The entire universe is nothing more than information.edit on 5/20/2012 by jiggerj because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by LifeIsEnergy
reply to post by NorEaster
Your whole premise stands upon the notion that there is an observer who is separate from the observed, which just cannot work.
the information that gathers with each instant occurrence of "now" is permanent, and will always remain as physically existent. In fact, this permanence is what establishes "natural law", contextual ramification, contextual precedence, and ultimately physical Identity itself.
Hell, even your self assurance that you have no actual Identity is part of your inimitable Identity. Ironic, isn't it?
I really don't know what to say. First, you have divided "now" into fragmented occurrences. Second, your belief that "natural law" has any "permanency" is beyond me. Third, your whole "Identity" spiel makes no sense whatsoever. If there is no identity then there is no "self assurance", much less is there the construct of identity within no-identity.
Maybe you could clarify further?edit on 19-5-2012 by LifeIsEnergy because: (no reason given)
You've created a computer program of the universe that you can watch on the monitor. Having gone to work for eight hours, when you return home you want to see what the program has been doing while you've been away. You are able to print out all the events that had occurred for those eight hours (even though those events have already passed and is no longer on your monitor), and you can do this because all of the information has been stored in your computer.
The entire universe is nothing more than information.edit on 5/20/2012 by jiggerj because: (no reason given)
A thought form appeared that makes you believe this is possible.edit on 20-5-2012 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by jiggerj
You believe that you could make a computer program that can record the WHOLE universe. This is a thought form that you believe. Show me your proof.
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by jiggerj
"You've created a computer program of the universe that you can watch on the monitor. Having gone to work for eight hours, when you return home you want to see what the program has been doing while you've been away. You are able to print out all the events that had occurred for those eight hours (even though those events have already passed and is no longer on your monitor), and you can do this because all of the information has been stored in your computer."
You wrote this.