It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Meanwhile, in Phoenix, Arizona, cocky Romney forces led by Nathan Sproul saw defeat snatched from the jaws of victory. Ironically, the Ron Paul forces came to the state GOP convention to play nice. They offered a deal. ”You know our knack for organizing?” They said, ” You know we have the numbers? Why don’t we make sure there are no surprises and nothing embarrassing. Your candidate has the nomination, we will give you 50% plus one of the delegation to Tampa, that gives you the majority, and let us have a nice delegation of the leftovers for our man too.” But no. The Mitt Romney forces insisted on scorched earth. ”You can have one,” they said. The Romney team then proceeded to fall apart. It was so bad that Ron Paul operative Shawn Dow couldn’t have given them a victory if he had wanted it. Said a Ron Paul staffer, “No matter how we tried, the Romney people wouldn’t move off their one delegate offer. We had no choice. We had to win.”
Your candidate has the nomination
Originally posted by MrWendal
I am a bit speechless about Arizona. Just wow
How silly can one person be? Take the majority and let us be, and that was not good enough. They forced the issue and, as what seems par for the course, Ron Paul supporters take the whole thing.
I am a little confused by this though.
Your candidate has the nomination
How can Romney "have the nomination" without the delegates to accomplish this?
Maybe I need to do some more reading, but it really stood out to me and a very strange comment to make.
Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by Common Good
You know, you can continue to attack the "naysayers" or you can play nice and try to convince them.
Either way, you're not doing Ron Paul many favors with this "stick it in your face" attitude.
Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by Common Good
You know, you can continue to attack the "naysayers" or you can play nice and try to convince them.
Either way, you're not doing Ron Paul many favors with this "stick it in your face" attitude.
Originally posted by jrmcleod
reply to post by NeoVain
Can anyone explain why this MAP shows RP with 0 delegates for both the aforementioned states?edit on 14/5/12 by jrmcleod because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by bl4ke360
Originally posted by jrmcleod
reply to post by NeoVain
Can anyone explain why this MAP shows RP with 0 delegates for both the aforementioned states?edit on 14/5/12 by jrmcleod because: (no reason given)
That site does't look accurate to me, it shows he only has 1 delegate in Iowa.
Originally posted by jrmcleod
reply to post by NeoVain
Can anyone explain why this MAP shows RP with 0 delegates for both the aforementioned states?edit on 14/5/12 by jrmcleod because: (no reason given)