It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Rachel Madow on Ron Paul

page: 1
9

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 3 2012 @ 03:29 PM
link   
I really cant stand this androgynous person but least its giving some air time about whats going on with Ron Paul
This is the vids title, "Ron Paul Won Minnesota & Washington State!"
This is my first time posting in this category, so, sorry if it has already been posted/discussed.

enjoy;





posted on May, 3 2012 @ 03:38 PM
link   
Even when we see this on a very biased left leaning MSM show, we still have delusional Obama people (and delusional establishment republicans) on ATS saying this isn't happening.

edit on 3-5-2012 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 3 2012 @ 03:41 PM
link   
reply to post by Wookiep
 


I know, I was very surprised to see a 4 minute piece on Ron Paul on the MSM period, much less from Rachel Madow.



posted on May, 3 2012 @ 04:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by Wookiep
Even when we see this on a very biased left leaning MSM show, we still have delusional Obama people (and delusional establishment republicans) on ATS saying this isn't happening.

edit on 3-5-2012 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)


Did you see how happy Rachel Maddow is???


Let me give you a hint...when I'm posting about Ron Paul...I have a very similar smile on my face.



posted on May, 3 2012 @ 04:23 PM
link   
Well the GOP should have tried just a little bit harder this time around at not being obviously corrupt - and by corrupt I mean downright evil.

You simply cannot adopt the "ends justify the means" mantra of the Jesuits, Socialists, and Nazis - abandon all pretense of truth and reason and not expect a little blow back from the lower rungs of society - i.e. US.



posted on May, 3 2012 @ 04:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher

Originally posted by Wookiep
Even when we see this on a very biased left leaning MSM show, we still have delusional Obama people (and delusional establishment republicans) on ATS saying this isn't happening.

edit on 3-5-2012 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)


Did you see how happy Rachel Maddow is???


Let me give you a hint...when I'm posting about Ron Paul...I have a very similar smile on my face.


You can give it up - your guy Romney is bound to go up against your guy Obama and then one of the two are bound to give homage and follow the every detail of your guy Rothschild. Its over, you've won. You can turn off go collect your paycheck and sit back and relax. We'll all just fall in line.



posted on May, 3 2012 @ 04:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher

Originally posted by Wookiep
Even when we see this on a very biased left leaning MSM show, we still have delusional Obama people (and delusional establishment republicans) on ATS saying this isn't happening.

edit on 3-5-2012 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)


Did you see how happy Rachel Maddow is???


Let me give you a hint...when I'm posting about Ron Paul...I have a very similar smile on my face.


I have a question for you.

Do you like what Ron Paul stands for?

I understand you're being realistic, but do you even like Ron Paul?



posted on May, 3 2012 @ 04:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by ararisq

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher

Originally posted by Wookiep
Even when we see this on a very biased left leaning MSM show, we still have delusional Obama people (and delusional establishment republicans) on ATS saying this isn't happening.

edit on 3-5-2012 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)


Did you see how happy Rachel Maddow is???


Let me give you a hint...when I'm posting about Ron Paul...I have a very similar smile on my face.


You can give it up - your guy Romney is bound to go up against your guy Obama and then one of the two are bound to give homage and follow the every detail of your guy Rothschild. Its over, you've won. You can turn off go collect your paycheck and sit back and relax. We'll all just fall in line.


Romney's not my guy...he is a bit too douchey for me.

If you can direct me to where I get this paycheck you are speaking of, I'd appreciate it.



posted on May, 3 2012 @ 04:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Mizzijr

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher

Originally posted by Wookiep
Even when we see this on a very biased left leaning MSM show, we still have delusional Obama people (and delusional establishment republicans) on ATS saying this isn't happening.

edit on 3-5-2012 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)


Did you see how happy Rachel Maddow is???


Let me give you a hint...when I'm posting about Ron Paul...I have a very similar smile on my face.


I have a question for you.

Do you like what Ron Paul stands for?

I understand you're being realistic, but do you even like Ron Paul?


I really like Ron Paul's foreign policy.

I absolutely disagree with his domestic policy, to the point that it over-rides the benefits of his foreign policy.


Most conservatives are completely opposite of me...hate his foreign policy and love his domestic policies...and this is Ron Paul's main problem...there is only a small portion of society that actually like both.



posted on May, 3 2012 @ 05:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by Mizzijr

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher

Originally posted by Wookiep
Even when we see this on a very biased left leaning MSM show, we still have delusional Obama people (and delusional establishment republicans) on ATS saying this isn't happening.

edit on 3-5-2012 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)


Did you see how happy Rachel Maddow is???


Let me give you a hint...when I'm posting about Ron Paul...I have a very similar smile on my face.


I have a question for you.

Do you like what Ron Paul stands for?

I understand you're being realistic, but do you even like Ron Paul?



Most dont understand, theyre just either pro-Obama, no matter how far hes taken our country down or just anti-republican, probably both.

btw, love the avatar... Kakashi with his Chidori

edit on 3-5-2012 by Juggernog because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 3 2012 @ 05:55 PM
link   
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
 


The differences from you and Rachel Maddow is she is reporting the news and your spouting off on line, though she leans to the left I think shes a closet Paul supporter.
Dr. Paul has run two previous campaigns for president this is his third.Dr. Paul does his research. He's had four years to decide and prepare for the 2012 process and election.
Dr. Paul is not a tool or a fool.
This election will not be a choice of the lesser of two evils.
See you at the convention.

Notice I didn't say she get's paid for it and you don't ?

edit on 3-5-2012 by OLD HIPPY DUDE because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 3 2012 @ 05:59 PM
link   
reply to post by OLD HIPPY DUDE
 



though she leans to the left I think shes a closet Paul supporter.




LOL, she does more than lean to the left...she is WAY to the left.

I think it's funny that you think she is a Paul supporter.



posted on May, 3 2012 @ 06:02 PM
link   
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
 


Personally, I dont think shes a Paul supporter, I think that she is just anti-Romney and shes excited that theres someone in the GOP that will upset the vote a bit and split the party. Kinda like Perot did in 92.
edit on 3-5-2012 by Juggernog because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 3 2012 @ 06:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by Juggernog
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
 


Personally, I dont think shes a Paul support, I think that she is just anti-Romney and shes excited that theres someone in the GOP that will upset the vote a bit and split the party. Kinda like Perot did in 92.


Yes, I think that is exactly why she is all smiles.

Democrats would love for Ron Paul to cause some trouble at the convention...it will help Obama out more than anything else that could happen at the convention.
edit on 3-5-2012 by OutKast Searcher because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 3 2012 @ 06:15 PM
link   
Being an anti Romney supporter dosen't make her a Obama supporter.
Besides she is giving Paul more air time than any other reporter or network.

The last third party candidate also had the initials R. P.

Can"t wait till the convention !



posted on May, 3 2012 @ 06:20 PM
link   
reply to post by OLD HIPPY DUDE
 


Maybe not but she is lol.



posted on May, 3 2012 @ 07:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by OLD HIPPY DUDE
Being an anti Romney supporter dosen't make her a Obama supporter.
Besides she is giving Paul more air time than any other reporter or network.

The last third party candidate also had the initials R. P.

Can"t wait till the convention !


MSNBC, in general, has always given Ron Paul more positive coverage than the other networks (FOX exclusions of Freedom Watch and Fact Check).

And I don't believe they defend him simply because he's not Romney; I think they genuinely see something good in him. Will they want him in over Obama? No. But if Obama's gonna lose to a Republican, Ron Paul isn't a terrible compromise.

Personally, I'd love it if Dr. Paul got in. If he wins the election, great. If not, I think Obama's foreign policy will be so scrutinized and questioned that he will have to change a lot of things in his next four years. Ron Paul winning the primaries is good for America, no matter who sits in the White House in 2013.



posted on May, 3 2012 @ 11:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher

Originally posted by Mizzijr

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher

Originally posted by Wookiep
Even when we see this on a very biased left leaning MSM show, we still have delusional Obama people (and delusional establishment republicans) on ATS saying this isn't happening.

edit on 3-5-2012 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)


Did you see how happy Rachel Maddow is???


Let me give you a hint...when I'm posting about Ron Paul...I have a very similar smile on my face.


I have a question for you.

Do you like what Ron Paul stands for?

I understand you're being realistic, but do you even like Ron Paul?


I really like Ron Paul's foreign policy.

I absolutely disagree with his domestic policy, to the point that it over-rides the benefits of his foreign policy.


Most conservatives are completely opposite of me...hate his foreign policy and love his domestic policies...and this is Ron Paul's main problem...there is only a small portion of society that actually like both.


And as a President, which do you think you would be able to have more control over?



posted on May, 3 2012 @ 11:39 PM
link   
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
 


" I absolutely disagree with his domestic policy, to the point that it over-rides the benefits of his foreign policy. "


Hmm... Lets see, Sound Money Backed by Gold , Reduced Taxation, Eliminating Antiquated Worthless Gov. Departments , Respecting the PRIVACY of American Citizens , Reducing the Deficit by a TRILLION Dollars in his Possible First Term in Office , Letting those who will NEVER see their SS Checks in their Old Age due to a Bankrupt System by 2034 Opt Out with the Option of Investing what they have already Paid in , Repealing the Patriot Act , Deescalating American War Mongering Foreign Policy, Creating a Positive Enviorment for Businesses to Thrive thus creating Jobs for those without one , Bringing PRIDE back to the American People by setting an Example for all to see.........

How you could possibly Disagree with the Right Honorable Dr. Ron Pauls Domestic Policies is Beyond Common Sense ...............



posted on May, 4 2012 @ 02:48 AM
link   
reply to post by Zanti Misfit
 


I would tend to agree that Ron Paul's domestic policy is good. However, I see where outcast is coming from. Even Ron Paul has touched on this but he is so busy spreading his message about what he would like to do versus what he realistically could do. Ron Paul has stated more then once that cutting off domestic welfare type programs immediately would not be good. That only when we stop spending money overseas, we could shore up our deficit spending. With overseas spending reduced, departments slashed, and the scope of government curtailed we could spend that money on domestic problems for a period of time while the dollar regains its buying power. Only when the dollar had returned to a decent value that a person could live comfortably should we scale back entitlement programs.

In philosophy I agree with both Ron Pauls domestic and foreign policy but its the domestic policy he doesn't elaborate on much that makes people concerned. He is not going to cut off every welfare program first thing. I would imagine he understands that there is a generation of people who have been taught the government is there to hand out free stuff when you fall down. This is only possible in a rich and prosperous nation, where anyone that wants to can obtain a higher level of living through their hard work, and where the money retains its value.



new topics

top topics



 
9

log in

join