Originally posted by ugie1028
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
How can I be ignorant when these caucus states are being overrun with Paul supporters? each and every-time Ron's been getting 50%+ from these caucus
states. (not the beauty contests)
how can you willfully ignore these wins?
and you have the nerve calling me ignorant. Face it pal, your buddy Obama is going to lose this election if he faces Ron Paul one on one. each caucus
victory brings the brokered convention even more inevitable and possibly stealing the nomination from Romney.
But of course... im willfully ignorant... against your point of view.
You just posted a poll that is weeks old and out of date...you aren't even owning up to it now.
I have said it for the past year...Obama's easiest election would be against Bachman...after that it would be Paul.
I am not denying anything...Paul is stealing as many delegates as he can...but it doesn't appear like it is going to be enough. His "74%" win in
LA...those weren't national delegates....the 152 in MO...those aren't national delegates. It's hilarious that Paul supporters claim they know how the
process works more than anyone else...and then report on mis-leading information.
I know, I know....they are going to abstain from voting or unbind themselves...or maybe they will just magically convince the entire RNC to vote for
Like I said...at this point I'm cheering for Ron Paul to cause as much chaos as he can at the convention...either way...it's a win for
edit on 29-4-2012 by OutKast Searcher because: (no reason given)