It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
For months, Boots, an 11-year-old cat from a suburb of Chicago, had been on "kitty death row." Her owner died last December, and a 20-year-old will stipulated any cats the woman owned at the time of her death be euthanized. But trust officers at Fifth Third Bank in charge of, um, executing the will, couldn't bring themselves to carry out the request. So they went to court. The bank asked a judge to set aside the provision, arguing that killing Boots "would violate public policy to euthanize a healthy housecat where an appropriate shelter has been identified." The judge agreed, and the bank was able to place her at a no-kill shelter.
Originally posted by PhoenixOD
It seems someone left instructions in their will to have their pet put down once they died. But Fifth Third Bank refused to do it.
For months, Boots, an 11-year-old cat from a suburb of Chicago, had been on "kitty death row." Her owner died last December, and a 20-year-old will stipulated any cats the woman owned at the time of her death be euthanized. But trust officers at Fifth Third Bank in charge of, um, executing the will, couldn't bring themselves to carry out the request. So they went to court. The bank asked a judge to set aside the provision, arguing that killing Boots "would violate public policy to euthanize a healthy housecat where an appropriate shelter has been identified." The judge agreed, and the bank was able to place her at a no-kill shelter.
Should the bank be able to overrule the instructions set out in the will?
Originally posted by boncho
Fifth-Third used to be one of the largest providers of pet insurance in America (Still is? Not sure..) but, a curious angle pops up in my mind. Did they have to pay out anything on the cat's death?
I'm not that familiar with pet insurance so I couldn't say.
Anyone?
Originally posted by boncho
Fifth-Third used to be one of the largest providers of pet insurance in America (Still is? Not sure..) but, a curious angle pops up in my mind. Did they have to pay out anything on the cat's death?
I'm not that familiar with pet insurance so I couldn't say.
Anyone?
Originally posted by pikestaff
.... yes, the bank did the right thing, ...