New Gear: Canon EOS 60Da For Astrophotography, page 1


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times
Topic started on 3-4-2012 @ 02:25 PM by UberL33t
Normally this wouldn't be of any intrigue to me however the one portion that piqued my ATS fancy enough to where I felt this article was post worthy was this camera's "specially modified IR filter" and "a sensor that's been altered for the specifics of taking photos of space".

Being that this camera is for the most part ($1500 USD), fairly affordable, as compared to having to purchase one's own Hubble Telescope ($1.5 billion USD). That and the Nibiru followers seem to think that it can only be filmed or captured within the IR spectrum, perhaps now we will be able to get some real photos...right?



The 60Da has a modified infrared filter as well as a sensor that has been adjusted to reduce noise over long exposures while increasing its sensitivity to hydrogen alpha (sometimes known as H-alpha). There's plenty of H-alpha floating around in space even though our eyes -- and most traditional digital camera sensors can't see it. It usually plays a pretty pivotal role in those awesome images of the sun we've been seeing lately that depict the wild solar storms and flares. The 60Da's APS-C sensor is roughly three times more sensitive to H-alpha with some help from the modified infrared filter. The final result is a 20-percent increase in transmittance of the hydrogen alpha line.

Since H-alpha is a biproduct of hydrogen atoms (this specific kind occurs when a hydrogen electron drops an energy level) it tends to have the most dramatic visual effect in nebulas rich in that element. The visual spectrum line that's created has a wavelength of 656.28nm, which falls into the realm of reds, which is part of the reason you see so many striking space images in that shade.


Full Article

It should only be a matter of time now before we will see some verifiable photographic proof posted on ATS of the illusive Brown Dwarf Star that is creeping about our solar system.
edit on 4/3/2012 by UberL33t because: Edited retail value of camera



reply posted on 3-4-2012 @ 02:28 PM by Dustytoad
reply to post by UberL33t



Cool camera, but you would still need a telescope to see much of anything that far away...

I am taking an Astronomy class over the summer, so I will definitely let you know If I see Nibiru haha.
edit on 4/3/2012 by Dustytoad because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 3-4-2012 @ 02:32 PM by GuidedKill
Originally posted by UberL33t
Normally this wouldn't be of any intrigue to me however the one portion that piqued my ATS fancy enough to where I felt this article was post worthy was this camera's "specially modified IR filter" and "a sensor that's been altered for the specifics of taking photos of space".

Being that this camera is for the most part ($500 USD), fairly affordable, as compared to having to purchase one's own Hubble Telescope ($1.5 billion USD). That and the Nibiru followers seem to think that it can only be filmed or captured within the IR spectrum, perhaps now we will be able to get some real photos...right?



The 60Da has a modified infrared filter as well as a sensor that has been adjusted to reduce noise over long exposures while increasing its sensitivity to hydrogen alpha (sometimes known as H-alpha). There's plenty of H-alpha floating around in space even though our eyes -- and most traditional digital camera sensors can't see it. It usually plays a pretty pivotal role in those awesome images of the sun we've been seeing lately that depict the wild solar storms and flares. The 60Da's APS-C sensor is roughly three times more sensitive to H-alpha with some help from the modified infrared filter. The final result is a 20-percent increase in transmittance of the hydrogen alpha line.

Since H-alpha is a biproduct of hydrogen atoms (this specific kind occurs when a hydrogen electron drops an energy level) it tends to have the most dramatic visual effect in nebulas rich in that element. The visual spectrum line that's created has a wavelength of 656.28nm, which falls into the realm of reds, which is part of the reason you see so many striking space images in that shade.


Full Article

It should only be a matter of time now before we will see some verifiable photographic proof posted on ATS of the illusive Brown Dwarf Star that is creeping about our solar system.
edit on 4/3/2012 by UberL33t because: (no reason given)


$500.00 Camera....check
$7000.00 Telescope......check
$100,000 country house with no light pollution.....check

All this money spent to see there is no killer planet, that if it were there it would be blocking out stars and the sun, and would not require a telescope to see that.....PRICELESS!!!!!!



reply posted on 3-4-2012 @ 02:54 PM by UberL33t
reply to post by Wrabbit2000



I mis-read the original article that points to the article in the OP, my mistake...

It comes with a price tag about $500 higher than an equivalent non-space-focused camera,


It was on the front page of the Popular Science website and the "Read More" article takes you to the link in the OP.




reply posted on 3-4-2012 @ 03:00 PM by Wrabbit2000
Originally posted by UberL33t
reply to
post by Wrabbit2000



I mis-read the original article that points to the article in the OP, my mistake...

It comes with a price tag about $500 higher than an equivalent non-space-focused camera,


It was on the front page of the Popular Science website and the "Read More" article takes you to the link in the OP.


Ahhh... Thank you for the clarification. I'm so buried in last minute school work for tonight I cant spare the time to go down a bunny trail looking up this model. I'm going to bring it up in class tomorrow night and get the instructors opinions though. I hadn't bought one yet...and maybe with this, I'll be glad I hadn't yet.


reply posted on 3-4-2012 @ 09:40 PM by UberL33t
reply to post by ngchunter



Indeed, I use it to observe stars not normally visible in normal visible light.


Very impressive shots!


reply posted on 5-4-2012 @ 09:41 AM by Silcone Synapse
reply to post by ngchunter



Wow,you modified the camera yourself?
That is hardcore!

Great results too.
Are those images of the Orion nebula single shots or composites?
What shutter speed did you use?




reply posted on 5-4-2012 @ 10:29 AM by ngchunter
Originally posted by Silcone Synapse
reply to
post by ngchunter



Wow,you modified the camera yourself?
That is hardcore!

Great results too.
Are those images of the Orion nebula single shots or composites?
What shutter speed did you use?


Those are single shots. I can't remember off hand what the shutter speed was, but the maximum for that camera is 8 seconds. I suspect it was about 4 seconds for those pictures. It's a great little video camera and does a superb job at imaging the planets and the moon (indeed it was the same camera I used to record my avatar image of the shuttle docked to the ISS for the final time), but I can't say that that's even close to my best for Orion, even with a video camera. I'll post my best "video frame" of orion later.
edit on 5-4-2012 by ngchunter because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 5-4-2012 @ 02:11 PM by Silcone Synapse
reply to post by ngchunter


For single shots they look amazing bud.
Totally cool !
I sussed out your avatar was the ISS,but to have captured it with the last shuttle docked is beyond awesome IMO.
Must be very tricky to photograph ,as it moves fast.
I would be proud of that photo forever if I had taken it.

Looking forward to your other Orion nebula images.



reply posted on 7-4-2012 @ 01:01 PM by ngchunter
Originally posted by Silcone Synapse
reply to
post by ngchunter


For single shots they look amazing bud.
Totally cool !
I sussed out your avatar was the ISS,but to have captured it with the last shuttle docked is beyond awesome IMO.
Must be very tricky to photograph ,as it moves fast.
I would be proud of that photo forever if I had taken it.

Looking forward to your other Orion nebula images.

Here's what is probably my best video frame capture of Orion:
i319.photobucket.com...
Here's one from the same night with the running man nebula visible below orion:
i319.photobucket.com...
Tracking ISS can be tricky, but I've got a pretty refined technique at this point which is what enabled me to capture it in broad daylight like that. The computer tracks it, I just help it along.
edit on 7-4-2012 by ngchunter because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 7-4-2012 @ 02:37 PM by Silcone Synapse
reply to post by ngchunter


Wow.
I simply do not have a drool bucket big enough...
Those shots are unquantifiable in their amount of awesomeness.

I hope you don't mind I copied them so I can zoom in.




reply posted on 7-4-2012 @ 05:46 PM by ngchunter
Originally posted by Silcone Synapse
reply to
post by ngchunter


Wow.
I simply do not have a drool bucket big enough...
Those shots are unquantifiable in their amount of awesomeness.

I hope you don't mind I copied them so I can zoom in.


Thanks, that's fine by me!
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Hubble\'s Hidden Treasures - Incredible views of the Universe
  Posted 17 days ago with 40 member flags
Mars curiosity Sol2 Anomalies
  Posted 11 days ago with 22 member flags
Curiosity Just Went Through Mud?
  Posted 0 days ago with 22 member flags
Mars: Fears Curiosity Will Contaminate Planet
  Posted 1 days ago with 21 member flags
Milky Way in detail.
  Posted 14 days ago with 13 member flags
Went to the moon, we never went, was scared off, still going!?
  Posted 15 days ago with 11 member flags