It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by zarp3333
To date, physicists cannot agree on the nature or mechanism of gravitational force or the hydrogen bond.
Instead of the traditional depiction of elecrons orbiting the nucleus like planets on a 2-Dimensional record player
Imagine a torus shaped like a grapefruit with a thin spindle in the middle.
Now imagine electrons spiraling up the outside from the bottom tracing the circumference. As the electron transitions from the wide circumference at the top, and go into the thin tube, they speed up, like water flushing down a drain.
This causes a vacume-like effect at the top or "negative" pole. When the electrons emerge from the bottom and make the transition to the outside, they send out a wave of energy.
Picture a rock hitting a pond. Only instead of 2D waves rippling away from the center, picture a spiral wave form coming out of the bottom.
This would also explain that gravity increases by the inverse square of the distance. As separate masses get closer, the poles of more and more molecules begin to line up thus increasing the attraction.
I initially used this theory to explain the hydrogen bond and magnetism.
Wouldn't it be cool if ATS got credit for finally figuring out gravity? Fick'n A!
Originally posted by Americanist
reply to post by Moduli
Let me guess... You're going to cite wikipedia for information on black holes?
Well then, go into your own personal explanation on how virtual mass-less particles shape reality.
which you probably do, as I do recall a thread insisting Hawking was "having words put into his mouth" by "TPTB" to mislead us about gravity....
These words don't make sense, but the answer to the version of these words that do is called quantum field theory.
The electromagnetic attraction between negatively charged electrons and positively charged protons in the nucleus causes the electrons to orbit the nucleus of the atom, just as gravitational attraction causes the earth to orbit the sun. The electromagnetic attraction is pictured as being caused by the exchange of large numbers of virtual massless particles of spin 1, called photons. Again, the photons that are exchanged are virtual particles. However, when an electron changes from one allowed orbit to another one nearer to the nucleus, energy is released and a real photon is emitted – which can be observed as visible light by the human eye, if it has the right wave-length, or by a photon detector such as photographic film. Equally, if a real photon collides with an atom, it may move an electron from an orbit nearer the nucleus to one farther away. This uses up the energy of the photon, so it is absorbed.
Originally posted by Americanist
reply to post by Moduli
Not my words, but he does reference virtual mass-less particles, and it sold books. Must make sense now.
Quantum field theory relies on quantum scale which is nothing more than a range of positions coupled with velocity.
But hey, let's talk spacecraft. What trajectories are they programmed to take?
Global communications up next... So how do cell phone towers work?
Quantum computing is a measurement of spin assigned on/ off positions.
We know what we know. We don't know what we don't know
Rather than the ones and zeroes of digital computing, quantum computers deal in what are known as superpositions - states of matter that can be thought of as both one and zero at once.
Originally posted by Americanist
reply to post by Moduli
Rather than the ones and zeroes of digital computing, quantum computers deal in what are known as superpositions - states of matter that can be thought of as both one and zero at once.