The following article is an important information that third party were involved in sniper shooting.
"Sniper Rifle Was Also Used In Ala. Killing
Third Assailant Possible In Ambush There, Police Say
By Allan Lengel
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, October 31, 2002; Page A01
"The rifle that was used in the Washington area sniper shootings also was used in last month's Alabama killing that led investigators to the
suspects, Montgomery, Ala., Police Chief John H. Wilson said yesterday, citing newly available results of ballistics tests.
He said James Cavanaugh, special agent in charge of the ATF in Alabama and Tennessee, told him that ballistics examiners were able to get a more
complete picture after examining a bullet test-fired from the sniper weapon......
Three federal law enforcement officials confirmed the new ballistics tests.....
The Alabama shootings occurred about 7:30 p.m., just as Parker and Adams were locking the door, "It was just like all the rest of the shootings -- no
one ever saw anyone," Adams said, referring to the Washington area attacks.....
A nearby patrol car pulled up and officers saw Muhammad standing over the two women, rummaging through their purses and holding a handgun in his right
hand, Wilson said. One officer tended to the victims. The second chased Muhammad, the chief said. Malvo was about 50 yards away, standing with a
magazine in his hand, possibly acting as a lookout, Wilson said, citing witness accounts.
The second officer continued chasing Muhammad through a restaurant parking lot, but a blue car darted out and blocked the path, Wilson said. Muhammad
and Malvo were arrested in a blue Caprice last week.
At the time of the liquor store shootings, Wilson said, police thought the car was at the wrong place at the wrong time. But once authorities learned
that Muhammad and Malvo had a blue car, he said, his suspicions turned to a possible third person."
From above report, we can conclude: The shooting was carried out by another person. He was the real sniper. Muhammad and Malvo had never been seen
holding a rifle. The whole story most likly like this: Muhammad and Malvo were support group of a sniper team. They were sent to do reconnaissance
job. This was the most dangerous job because they were easy to be arrested on the scene. The blue Caprice was a working car. Some team member drove it
to block the police chasing. All action were well trained: reconnaissance; cover up, evasion..... it reacted what Muhammad had said to his friend in
Jamaica that he had worked for the CIA and FBI, and that he had to return to the States periodically to give military training workshops." (see #104.
Sniper case, (5) Muhammad in Jamaica) (also According to Newsweek magazine, when Muhammad was travelling from Washington State to Washington, DC to
participate the shooting case, he stopped to see his cousins in Baton Rouge, LA. He told them that he was on a "secret mission" for the military.
His cousins dismissed him as a lunatic then.But now it seems he told truth.)
When Muhammad and Malvo were arrested, police also found walky talky(or mobile phone?) and satellite locater in car. These were unneccessary for them
if they were the sole sniper. But it was useful if they acted as reconnaissance. With satellite locater, the commander of the sniper team was able to
know the location of all support groups and instruct these groups to move to the spot for reconnaissance and cover up purpose by walky talky. Muhammad
and Malvo was one of these support groups doing same job they had done in Alabama shooting case. That's why they were seen at the shooting scene and
even was photoed by surveillance camara. This also explained why the sniper could keep on his shooting spree in a high alert surrounding without being
caught. They were well trained and supported by large resources. Once the murderer became the investigator, they could never been discovered. Their
mind also displayed in taro card left for local police,"I'm God." Because they also could command local police force.
Sometime later, governmet denied ballistic test said above. They said the bullet in Alabama case was not from the sniper rifle. Obviously they made up
their mind to frame up only two persons but cover the real one. But when they manipulated the evidence by "made to fit", and fire arm's "finger
print"-ballistic test became untrustworthy, how can we believe their "hard evidence" anymore?