It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ANOK
Even IF it collapsed the way they claim the outer walls COULD NOT have waited for the center to collapse and fold inwards on the top. There is a way that can be achieved, it's called implosion demolition.
Originally posted by Varemia
That's because they didn't fall inward.
The entire South wall is gone
and the other walls probably pulled in because, wait for it, they were still attached to the rest of the building! Crazy, huh?
Gravity should have just blown the building all across New York, right? We should have seen hollywood style destruction for it to be real. No way that in real life, buildings can collapse internally before collapsing entirely, and then lean toward the South and have parts of the wall still intact on top of the pile.
Seriously Anok, stop focusing on stupid things.
Originally posted by ANOK
No actually I don't, I want to debate you, not someone else through you. You are the one here claiming I'm wrong, so address my point with your own knowledge, not someone else's that you obvioulsy think is correct simply because it's from an 'authority'.
So you have NO idea yourself if I am right or not. I'm hear to debate you not your 'experts'. Many experts agree with me. But who cares I am an EXPERT. You have no idea who I am.
My own education mate. I don't need someone else to tell me what is right or wrong, or what to think.
Maths is not required to see the obvious. You all seem to fall back to this whenever you have nothing else.
I'm not in this debate to solve the 911 conspiracy, I am simply here to debate idiots who fail to understand basic physics, my beef is with you not the perps of 911. I am under no illusion that the true story will ever come out. I'm not living in lala land lol. I just like to see you guys get all pissed off because someone dares to question your reality...
Originally posted by ANOK
Maths is not required to see the obvious. You all seem to fall back to this whenever you have nothing else.
Originally posted by ANOK
Yes they did, post collapse pics verify that. Do you have evidence of your claims?
No, just ridiculous. The walls would be pushed outwards, path of least resistance, as the buildings internals would push against them, not pull them inwards. If that was the case then implosion demolition would not be necessary for any building.
You'd like me to stop focusing on this wouldn't you? I know you prefer the easy stuff that doesn't challenge your thinking.
Why don't you stop focusing on me if you don't like my posts? Go argue with someone else, it is that easy mate.
Originally posted by Varemia
Originally posted by ANOK
Even IF it collapsed the way they claim the outer walls COULD NOT have waited for the center to collapse and fold inwards on the top. There is a way that can be achieved, it's called implosion demolition.
The entire South wall is gone
Originally posted by Varemia
I don't see the south wall there. I just see some lines drawn over the rubble with Paint.
Wat... Are you serious? Oh, it's April fools, I get it. I mean, no one would actually think that a building would just squish downward and push its walls away. That's just stupid. Good joke, Anok!
Originally posted by ANOK
No, the outer walls should have been under the rubble, not on top, and spread outside of its footprint, as the they would pushed out to the path of least resistance. If it leaned to the west as claimed then post collapse pics would show that, but they don't.
Originally posted by ReconX
Originally posted by Varemia
The entire South wall is gone
What?
Originally posted by DrEugeneFixer
reply to post by ReconX
I see. I was confused by one of the WFC buildings in the foreground, along with the WFC winter garden dome. This might be interesting, but I'd like some more photos of this event, or some clearer ones before I'm convinced that it's fire.
Originally posted by Varemia
Originally posted by ReconX
Originally posted by Varemia
The entire South wall is gone
What?
The building fell toward the South. The South wall was buried under rubble.
Originally posted by ReconX
Why can it be seen in the images of the rubble then?
Originally posted by Varemia
Originally posted by ReconX
Why can it be seen in the images of the rubble then?
Are you so certain that's the South wall? Think about the number of floors the building has. I'll help you. 47. Now, count the floors, and maybe you'll see where I'm coming from.
Originally posted by longjohnbritches
World Trade Center
2009 November | 9/11 - A Cheap Magic Trick
“[T]here was just an explosion [in the south tower]. It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions.”–
Firefighter Richard Banaciski
“I saw a flash flash flash [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building?”
–Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory
“[I]t was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear ‘Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop’.”
–Paramedic Daniel Rivera
The above quotations come from a collection of 9/11 oral histories that, although recorded by the Fire Department of New York at the end of 2001, were not publicly released
search.yahoo....**http%3a//911caper.com/2009/11/
edit on 3/31/2012 by longjohnbritches because: urledit on 3/31/2012 by longjohnbritches because: nasty urls
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by longjohnbritches
Its good that we have actual video and audio evidence of the events so we do not need to rely on often unreliable or subjective eyewitness reports. But for the sake of the truth movement, lets ignore that evidence. Its not a good practice to base your opinion on objective evidence that anyone can verify if you want to be a truther.