It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by agentofchaos
you think we're advanced? If we were advanced we wouldn't s*** where we eat...
deuces
Originally posted by KJV1611
reply to post by chr0naut
God held it back:
DANIEL 12
4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and KNOWLEDGE shall be increased.
Think about it, our new tech is the worst thing that has happened to us humans. We were much better off without it.
Now that the end of the world is fast approaching, God released the flood gates of knowledge so we could kill our self that much more efficiently. Don't believe me? Stick around a few more years....wait till you see what the near future has in store.
Originally posted by OrphenFire
reply to post by KJV1611
You actually worship someone who would commit such an atrocity?
Originally posted by chr0naut
Humans have been around for ages (3 million or more years according to current Science) and yet it is only in the last 100 or so years that we have progressed from horse & cart to the Internet & Space.
The start of the upward spike of the application of knowledge could have occurred anywhere, (ancient India, China, the Middle East or Greece), at any time but it seemed to come mainly from Europe and only a few decades ago.
So, what was it? Or conversely, what propelled us forward?
Originally posted by zerotime
Religion held us back. And I'm not bashing religion just stating a fact. Religion is still fighting science tooth and nail on any modern advances.edit on 14-3-2012 by zerotime because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by xavi1000
RELIGION
and she is continue to holding us back ...
Originally posted by BrokenCircles
[color=FF8E38]The title of this thread, is a question. I have given my answer, clearly. If you want to disagree with my actual answer, then I will be happy to discuss it.
No, but irrelevant ignorance should be.
Originally posted by petrus4
Even if I had done that, is that a crime?