Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Possible Footage of Explosions in North Tower

page: 1
0

log in

join

posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 02:44 PM
link   



Keep your eye on WTC 1, as the second plane crashes into WTC 2. - At the exact time of the crash, you can see explosions occuring on possibly 10 floors. Look closely how the smoke plumes suddenly appear.

Here's a witness to the collapse:



edit on 11-3-2012 by revolutionphase1 because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 02:48 PM
link   
the heat of the explosion (left) is very intense and can "feed" already burning spots and flame them up without direct contact.



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 03:07 PM
link   
Or.

The shockwave, soundwave from the explosion in WTC 2 shatters the overheated glas from the fire at WTC 1 and the smoke pours out from the new hole.



posted on Mar, 11 2012 @ 04:41 PM
link   
Still wondering,l however, what your point is, exactly?

Bush did it?



posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 02:58 AM
link   
Looks to me that WTC 1 is taking multiple hits from flying debris.



posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 03:01 AM
link   
Waw, I seen alot of footage from 9/11 but never seen this guy's witness...tells you how much the information is restricted in this country...



posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 03:30 AM
link   
Just a hint, if this (or any other) footage turns out not to show explosions (which is the case by the way), what does this mean for the theory that explosives were used?



posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 01:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by -PLB-
Just a hint, if this (or any other) footage turns out not to show explosions (which is the case by the way), what does this mean for the theory that explosives were used?


It means there really were controlled demolitions and the video is fake. To these people, everything that proves there were no conspiracy only proves there really was a conspiracy.

This is why they say we need to regard eyewitness accounts as unimpeachable information whenever they report "they heard explosions" because eyewitness accounts can never be wrong...unless eyewitnesses say they saw a plane hit the Pentagon, in which case they're really disinformation agents who cannot be trusted.



posted on Mar, 12 2012 @ 04:31 PM
link   
reply to post by GoodOlDave
 


I'm not too sure about that. There had to be a lot of air compression coming off the collision at WTC2, some other videos shown a similar effect around WTC1. It is noticeable that smoke does come from windows that previously had none, that suggests that the windows were intact up to that point, the big question is, if there was enough air blast from the collision to blow out the windows from both the faces of the building we can see, and the face overlooking WTC2, or all faces for that matter.



posted on Mar, 15 2012 @ 08:33 AM
link   
reply to post by phantomjack
 


having in mind the simplistic nature of your question,
we shall indulge you with a simplistic answer: yes.
bush was in on it. he masterminded it, bush jr. is the
smartest, smuggest, most evilest mind in these parts
of the universe. so yes, bush did it.

dick cheney (on the other hand) was, and still is, just
a poser.

also, bono.

you're welcome.
edit on 15-3-2012 by psyop911 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 15 2012 @ 03:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by smurfy
reply to post by GoodOlDave
 


I'm not too sure about that. There had to be a lot of air compression coming off the collision at WTC2, some other videos shown a similar effect around WTC1. It is noticeable that smoke does come from windows that previously had none, that suggests that the windows were intact up to that point, the big question is, if there was enough air blast from the collision to blow out the windows from both the faces of the building we can see, and the face overlooking WTC2, or all faces for that matter.



Yeah, but the smoke is coming from a window that's about four feet away from a window that's already billowing smoke, so if the question is where the smoke is coming from, it's already been answered- it's all in the same room.

If the question is genuinely how the window was broken at that specific time that the second plane came along then I would venture a guess that the shock wave from the impact caused an already damaged window from the first impact to shatter completely. However, with a title like "possible footage of explosions in North Tower" it's pretty clear the idea isn't to ask what was causing the smoke or what broke the _ The idea was to use the smoke and the broken window to grasp at straws and give validity to this "secret controlled demoliitons" hoax.

Where are the flashes the OP was referring to? If these were genuine explosives at the window we wouldn't need to squint at the video or wash it through any color filters to see them. They'd be right there blatantly obvious for anyone to see.





new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join