It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
An 11-year Canadian study suggests the youngest children in a classroom are more likely to be assessed as having attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) compared to their older classmates, raising concerns that many schoolchildren are wrongly being diagnosed and prescribed medication
children born in December were 39 per cent more likely to be diagnosed and 48 per cent more likely to be treated with medication for ADHD
This is truly a "Duh Moment " for research ! Has it taken this long for them to realize that children born later in the year are developmentally younger than their peers who were born earlier ? The rate of development in children is such that a year is a very significant time span. Could it be that the researchers were all born in December ?
Originally posted by el1jah
"Oh my God, this 4 year old has such a short attention span! He must have ADHD?"
Kids have short attention spans, there is nothing more to it, . .
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by ModernAcademia
Whenever I see a kid being diagnosed with ADHD and put on meds I think only one thing: Failed parent. .
Originally posted by Ariess
No, ADD and ADHD are made up diseases to diagnose on kids who are lazy, uninterested, hyper, and naughty. There are certainly other ways to deal with these types of kids. Even a good smack is better then feeding them speeders to form an artificial alertness and attention in them.
Whenever I see a kid being diagnosed with ADHD and put on meds I think only one thing: Failed parent.
Originally posted by Ariess
reply to post by Annee
I agree that my personal experience is but my personal experience. That paragraph was intended to use my experience to back the op's message that, of course, adhd/add is over/misdiagnosed. The paragraph you quoted was my opinion on the subject all together. Which is, yes there are hyper, lazy, uninterested, and naughty children, but this is not indicative of some learning disability or mental issue. It is a behavior problem that can be addressed in a number of ways. This does not/should not include feeding them speeders. It not only is dangerous, in my opinion, but it fails to address the issue at hand. Rather, it induces an artificial alertness and attention by over stimulating their nervous system. Perhaps, I should have made it clear that it was my opinion, but through my own experience and observation over other "add" kids I have found it to be valid.