It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Originally posted by Tecumte
Ron Paul the biggest threat to Liberty???? LOL . A 'rascist"??? Will start a war with China and we'll all die??? Has Alzheimer's ??? Wow. Is that really the kind of 'oppositon Dr. Paul has. Speaks volumes. I'm wondering if Karl Rove not only works overtime trying to smear Demo challengers but also people within the party. But then of course it's only smoke and mirrors, no need to assasinate the Welstone's of the world, doesn't matter who's in..... rightedit on 7-2-2012 by Tecumte because: spelling
His opposition to Ron Paul is not rovian in any sense of the word. His position on the Constitution is based at least on his anarchist views, which is neither Republican nor Libertarian, but quite leftist I'm sure, maybe Chomskyite. I heard today some stupid remarks about the Constitution. Only a leftist radical would make such idiotic remarks about the Constitution. Oh wait, it was a Supreme Court Justice. It's a sad day when a Supreme Court Justice shows such abject contempt for that which that Justice is supposed to defend.edit on 8-2-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)edit on 8-2-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by andreoutlaw
reply to post by Tecumte
You obviously added some ridiculous things I never said, but I won't go so low as to claim that this kind of immature behavior somehow represents the total inability of Ron Paul's supporters to address any real issue outside of rhetorical arguments and fantastical Hollywood nonsense, because I don't think that would be constructive or appropriate within a discussion this serious.
Originally posted by KonquestAbySS
reply to post by andreoutlaw
Well Michael Scheuer seems to agree a lot with what Ron Paul says even if you think it is a personal belief, if you never heard of him I suggest looking him up. It is more about non-interventionism being whats best for the United States at the moment.
Originally posted by Tecumte
Originally posted by andreoutlaw
reply to post by Tecumte
You obviously added some ridiculous things I never said, but I won't go so low as to claim that this kind of immature behavior somehow represents the total inability of Ron Paul's supporters to address any real issue outside of rhetorical arguments and fantastical Hollywood nonsense, because I don't think that would be constructive or appropriate within a discussion this serious.
We'll didn't mean to add some things you never said (or implied?), was just tryng to paraphrase what I thought I understood you were trying to say. I could go back and copy and paste your exact slams of Dr. Paul but don't care to take the time for such silliness. Anyway, I have said many times I don't look to gov. to solve my problems personally, and too I think a huge part of it could be dismantled and nobody would even miss it, and likely we'd all be much freer and happier.
But do president's have ANY power to affect things, well maybe, maybe not, but the simple point many have made here is that IF someone is going to take the time to vote for president, and IF they feel maybe there is some chance of whomever is selected having ANY sort of positive affect then Dr. Ron Paul is the best of anyone running IMO. People can agree or disagree if they want, if I do feel I'm going to take the time to vote this year it will be Ron Paul or nobody. I do think it's likely some politicians are less owned than others and may be better choices than others, one does have to wonder why the Corporate Criminal Cabal wastes it time murdering people like Paul Wellstone and his family or killing people like J.F.K. if it really has no affect at all (again paraphrasing what it seems you are saying/implying.edit on 8-2-2012 by Tecumte because: spelling
Originally posted by andreoutlaw
"Maybe Ron Paul can save the world" is the kind of Hollywood movie thinking I am speaking of. This is not a logical or valid position to take, if one critically analyzes all of the involved factors.
Originally posted by andreoutlaw
reply to post by FinalAccount2008
I don't understand.
Maybe I'm missing something.
Originally posted by Tecumte
reply to post by andreoutlaw
"Time to grow up."-...... Ha you guys are funny,,,,,
And too you didn't hear or respond to a word I said.
If you care to have a fair exchange try and post something remotely usefull and take the real time to listen....
Anyway, if I do decide to take the time to vote it will be for Ron paul or nobody. I expect many others here and elsewhere feel exactly the same way and there's not much people like you can do to change that.
edit on 9-2-2012 by Tecumte because: spelling
Originally posted by KonquestAbySS
Well for the sake of argument, that would only be a valid reason that can help save mankind. I was however going for more of a tangible approach,even if Ron Paul himself can't deliver, then I am sure his son Rand Paul can...
Originally posted by KonquestAbySS
reply to post by andreoutlaw
Wait I never said I voted for anyone at the moment..Honestly I have never voted, but Ron Paul intrigues me with the whole constitution bit. If anything he is the only person in my mind that has made sense. I have never voted in my life I am almost 30. I never voted for Obama, or Bush...This will be the first year I vote and that will be for Ron Paul. I have never flip flopped. I always hated politics, but Ron Paul caught me I am abiding by what the Constitution states. I am all for that. He seems consistent.