It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl12
reply to post by AQuestion
But Question, regardless of whether or not the kids understand, teachers should not touch, fondal or become sexually active with a child. As for the Mary Kay Letourneau case where she marries the kid later on, that's very rare.edit on 31-1-2012 by Quetzalcoatl12 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by AQuestion
Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl12
reply to post by AQuestion
But Question, regardless of whether or not the kids understand, teachers should not touch, fondal or become sexually active with a child. As for the Mary Kay Letourneau case where she marries the kid later on, that's very rare.edit on 31-1-2012 by Quetzalcoatl12 because: (no reason given)
Dear Quetzalcoatl,
Firstly, thank you for the teachers name, I blanked and couldn't remember it. As I said before, it is wrong for teacher to violate their trust and I even felt that way in graduate school. What I am saying is that we cannot have it both ways, we cannot tell kids in school that sex is okay and then hand them a condom and expect them not to use it if they get the chance. By the way, this is not about religion this is about having a societal rejection of underage sex and we no longer do. This has always been the argument by pedophiles. They say that sex is natural and that people used to get married at 12 and that it is just a normal thing to feel.
Children are impulsive and don't have complex morals, those come about by time and experience. If you tell children that underage sex is not bad then they will have underage sex. In California they are now going to begin teaching about sex in first grade. The argument has been that kids are going to have sex so we might as well teach them how to do it safely. Okay and you end up with kids having underage sex. You cannot separate belief from action, it is a result you can anticipate.
I see what your saying but I feel as if your blaming the child since the OP is about 23 elementary age kids being abused. So your going to teach them about sex what does that have to do with being RAPED!!
Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl12
Ok if we can steer the conversation back towards the OP and not blame CHILDREN for being sexually assaulted that would be great
Originally posted by Stryc9nine
i don't trust male elementary school teachers...
Originally posted by AQuestion
reply to post by Quetzalcoatl12
Dear Quetzalcoalt12,
You have asked me many questions and accused of many beliefs. Let me ask you AQuestion. If two 16 year old kids have sex, should that be illegal? It is a simple question. If a 90 year old sleeps with a 16 year old, is your answer the same? Last question, is it the age difference or the age? If you do not answer those questions then you really don't care about these children and what laws we need in place to protect them.
What exactly does this have to do with this POS teacher? This wasn't two minors having consenting sex or two adults having sex or even an adult and a minor. This was a teacher, in a position of authority, sexaully abusing those in his care. These were 7-9 y/o kids!!! Your question is irrelevant to the discussion. This is about pedophiles placing themselves into positions of trust with our kids.