It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
To the best of my knowledge, the put options have not been investigated.
Originally posted by Cassius666
There has been a spike in trading before the attacks with regard to companies that lost and gained disproportionally in value after 911, yes. I am not sure to what degree information is avaiable, who exactly bought and sold. And even if it would be avaiable, most of those who took advantage of information avaiable to them of an impending flase flag information surely conducted their buisness through a front.
Originally posted by samkent
It has been posted time after time on this site.
They have been investigated.
It's the six week rule.
Every six weeks new people join the site and ask the same questions as have been asked before.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by samkent
It has been posted time after time on this site.
They have been investigated.
It's the six week rule.
Every six weeks new people join the site and ask the same questions as have been asked before.
Not only that, but the airline stocks went on a never ending downward spiral aftter 9/11, and in fact two months ago it's been announced the parent company of American Airlines went bankrupt and their stocks are no longer being traded on the NYSE.
So in short, the "secret conspiracy" was to stage a fake terrorist attack in order to buy airline stocks at a discounted price shortly before they became worthless. Only to the 9/11 conspiracy mongors does this make even a microbe of sense. Maybe losing your shirt in the stock market is sacred to the Illuminati.edit on 5-1-2012 by GoodOlDave because: (no reason given)
6 times average trading volume with regard to the aforementioned stocks....
Originally posted by Cassius666
Obviously you are not versed in stock trading and I assume you have an expert handling your finances, which is the best thing to do in your situation. But look up short selling to learn how you profit if you expect a stock to decline in the long or short therm.
Originally posted by samkent
It has been posted time after time on this site.
They have been investigated.
It's the six week rule.
Every six weeks new people join the site and ask the same questions as have been asked before.
Originally posted by AQuestion
Originally posted by samkent
It has been posted time after time on this site.
They have been investigated.
It's the six week rule.
Every six weeks new people join the site and ask the same questions as have been asked before.
My question was not about the stocks themselves; but, was about whether or not any of the politicians benefited from betting on certain stocks.
Originally posted by Seventh
Originally posted by AQuestion
Originally posted by samkent
It has been posted time after time on this site.
They have been investigated.
It's the six week rule.
Every six weeks new people join the site and ask the same questions as have been asked before.
My question was not about the stocks themselves; but, was about whether or not any of the politicians benefited from betting on certain stocks.
Here`s a good lead to follow ....
www.tomflocco.com...
you're now making up claims off the tops of your heads that these same insiders actually borrowed airline stocks from other shareholders, sold them, and then placed a put option just before the attack so they could buy them back to replace them at a cheaper price to make a profit. Is that really what you're saying?
Is there really no limit to just how unnecessarily complex and convoluted your conspriacy claims are becoming?
It is not complex or convoluted.