It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Jews say "The Christians have nothing to stand on," and the Christians say, "The Jews have nothing to stand on," although they [both] recite the [same] Scripture. Thus the polytheists speak the same as their words. But Allah will judge between them on the Day of Resurrection concerning that over which they used to differ. - 2:113
Being that Jesus himself was a Jew
Romans 3 1What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision? 2Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God. 3For what if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect?
Oracle 1. a. A shrine consecrated to the worship and consultation of a prophetic deity, as that of Apollo at Delphi. b. A person, such as a priestess, through whom a deity is held to respond when consulted. c. The response given through such a medium, often in the form of an enigmatic statement or allegory. 2. a. A person considered to be a source of wise counsel or prophetic opinions. b. An authoritative or wise statement or prediction. 3. A command or revelation from God. 4. In the Bible, the sanctuary of the Temple.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by miniatus
Being that Jesus himself was a Jew
Hi, I'm not being confrontational, but are you sure Jesus was a Jew? I was always told him being a Jew was a Myth, he was Judean, big difference. Here is some information, perhaps it is incorrect. If you can find flaws with the content in the source (please don't attack the source) I would be interested to hear about it.
JESUS WAS NOT A Jew
Like I said, I don't mind being proven wrong. I prefer it at times since that way I'm no longer believing disinformation. Perhaps you can help clear this up for me.edit on 1-1-2012 by Corruption Exposed because: (no reason given)
Luke 2:21And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb. 22And when the days of her purification according to the law of Moses were accomplished, they brought him to Jerusalem, to present him to the Lord; 23(As it is written in the law of the LORD, Every male that openeth the womb shall be called holy to the Lord 24And to offer a sacrifice according to that which is said in the law of the Lord, A pair of turtledoves, or two young pigeons. 25And, behold, there was a man in Jerusalem, whose name was Simeon; and the same man was just and devout, waiting for the consolation of Israel: and the Holy Ghost was upon him. 26And it was revealed unto him by the Holy Ghost, that he should not see death, before he had seen the Lord's Christ. 27And he came by the Spirit into the temple: and when the parents brought in the child Jesus, to do for him after the custom of the law, 28Then took he him up in his arms, and blessed God, and said, 29Lord, now lettest thou thy servant depart in peace, according to thy word: 30For mine eyes have seen thy salvation, 31Which thou hast prepared before the face of all people; 32A light to lighten the Gentiles, and the glory of thy people Israel. 33And Joseph and his mother marvelled at those things which were spoken of him. 34And Simeon blessed them, and said unto Mary his mother, Behold, this child is set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel; and for a sign which shall be spoken against; 35(Yea, a sword shall pierce through thy own soul also,) that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed.
Luke 2:41Now his parents went to Jerusalem every year at the feast of the passover. 42And when he was twelve years old, they went up to Jerusalem after the custom of the feast. 43And when they had fulfilled the days, as they returned, the child Jesus tarried behind in Jerusalem; and Joseph and his mother knew not of it.
Originally posted by Greatest I am
Whose view of the O T is authoritative? Jewry or Christianity?
In reading and discussing the O T, I have noted that the Jewish view is in some cases completely opposite of what the Christian view is.
I E. The Jews see Eden as man’s elevation to a moral sense, while Christians see Eden as man’s fall. Jews do not recognize original sin while Christians do.
Jews also do not read the O T as literal and historic while Christians do.
Whose interpretation should hold precedence? The Jewish view or the Christian one?
When Christianity usurped the Jewish God, should they have also usurped their interpretations as well, instead of reversing them?
Regards
DL
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by miniatus
Being that Jesus himself was a Jew
Hi, I'm not being confrontational, but are you sure Jesus was a Jew? I was always told him being a Jew was a Myth, he was Judean, big difference. Here is some information, perhaps it is incorrect. If you can find flaws with the content in the source (please don't attack the source) I would be interested to hear about it.
JESUS WAS NOT A Jew
Like I said, I don't mind being proven wrong. I prefer it at times since that way I'm no longer believing disinformation. Perhaps you can help clear this up for me.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by WarminIndy
No offense but an old book that has been rewritten many times is not a very convincing source. I appreciate the efforts though. I know my source may not be the most trustworthy either, but which part of my source was incorrect?
I'm still confident he was Judean which is regional name, not a religious name. Many theologians have studied all the scriptures and can agree that most of the bible is purely agenda induced propaganda.
Do you believe something just because it was in the bible? If so, then the story of Jonah and the whale must really interest you, or how Satan and God used Job as a pawn in their sick bet.
Jesus was not a Jew.
They mocked him as "the king of Judea", not "the king of the Jews"
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by WarminIndy
Do you believe something just because it was in the bible? If so, then the story of Jonah and the whale must really interest you, or how Satan and God used Job as a pawn in their sick bet.
So go ahead, prove to me those things mentioned are true using original sources.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by WarminIndy
So go ahead, prove to me those things mentioned are true using original sources.
I never claimed them to be true, and you know this.
So why should I have to prove them to be true?
So, if it is not true because it was in the Bible, and you don't want me to believe in the Bible, then I have no reason to believe any of those people existed at all and all those places are mere legends.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by WarminIndy
So, if it is not true because it was in the Bible, and you don't want me to believe in the Bible, then I have no reason to believe any of those people existed at all and all those places are mere legends.
I never said you had to believe "those people existed at all and all those places are mere legends."
Are you purposely being obtuse?
Look pal all I did was ask Miniatus' opinion on the content of the source I provided. You took it upon yourself to join our discussion, which is fine since it's an open board, then continued to purposely twist things I have said to support your side of the argument.
So what, I don't believe in the bible. If you want to, go ahead. I respect one's right to worship. Stop being such a meanie
Personally, I think it's pretty obvious that the tales told in the source I provided are much more believable than the ones in the bible.
Jona and the whale is one of my favorites, as a child that is.edit on 2-1-2012 by Corruption Exposed because: (no reason given)
I was always told him being a Jew was a Myth, he was Judean, big difference.
There were, between when Jesus preached, and the destruction of the temple.
During His lifetime, no persons were described as "Jews" anywhere.
Originally posted by miniatus
Being that Jesus himself was a Jew, I would say they have a leg up as far as accuracy and such..
With that said - I view these texts as a collection of ancient stories that have been integrated and updated as a set of morality tales .. Many of the biblical stories you find actually predate the bible in some form or another by quite a long time.. as I posted in another thread, you could almost view it this way..
Imagine the story of little red riding hood.. Now I'm going to take that story and rewrite it, but I'm going to place it in modern day new york and I'm going to add a moral lesson that red riding hood survived her ordeal because God sent an angel to warn her... I make the wolf a demon sent by satan .. and I'll give them both actual names.
Now lets write this down, lets teach our children... in a thousand years or so someone will find it, they will see that new york really existed and suddenly this story will have some credence .. It doesn't matter that I borrowed that story..
This is largely how the bible has evolved and come to be.. it's a collection of ancient tales reworked for morality and context..edit on 1/1/2012 by miniatus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sHuRuLuNi
The Jews say "The Christians have nothing to stand on," and the Christians say, "The Jews have nothing to stand on," although they [both] recite the [same] Scripture. Thus the polytheists speak the same as their words. But Allah will judge between them on the Day of Resurrection concerning that over which they used to differ. - 2:113edit on 1/1/2012 by sHuRuLuNi because: (no reason given)