It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Russ Caswell remembers driving a bulldozer at age 11 to help clear farmland for his father to build the Motel Caswell in the 1950s.
Six decades later, the family’s $57-per-night budget motel is a sought-after property, not because of the cheap accommodations, but because the federal government says it is a magnet for drug deals.
Caswell is fighting a move by the U.S. Department of Justice to take his motel under a law that allows for the forfeiture of properties connected to crimes.
If the government wins, under a provision of the law known as “equitable sharing,” the Tewksbury police department could collect up to 80 percent of the proceeds from the sale of the motel. That would amount to more than $1 million, if the motel sells for the most recent town assessment of just over $1.5 million.
In the past 20 years, the Caswells have rented out approximately 125,000 rooms. Of the renters, about .05 percent have been arrested for crimes. As "good" citizens, the Caswells have meticulously reported any suspicious activity on the part of renters to the police, including possible drug use.
Only three states demand that the government show "beyond a reasonable doubt" that the property was part of a criminal act.
Most states, 27, use a lower "preponderance of the evidence" standard - basically, the government must show it is more likely than not that the property was related to criminal conduct. This is also the standard in federal law.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
reply to post by Maluhia
Whatever became of Our right to be safe from unreasonable seizure...?
That pesky Bill of Rights is dead, dead, dead.
Thanks for this one (of MANY such stories of seizure - 80% of those who have property seized are NEVER CHARGED WITH A CRIME!).
Being innocent does not matter. Not being arrested or convicted of a crime is no protection. With amazing ease, the government can take everything you own. And to recover it, you must prove your innocence through an expensive and difficult court proceeding in which a severely lowered standard of evidence favors the government. This is civil asset forfeiture.
The U.S. Department of Justice paid out nearly $390 million in equitable sharing payments to law enforcement agencies in Fiscal Year 2010, up from about $207 million in 2003, according to figures provided by the DOJ.
The department said it does not keep statistics about how many properties are seized, only how much money is paid out to law enforcement agencies through the program.
is a home depot where alot of drug dealers get busted and police patrol it and get lucky often(I don't get why any dealer would go to a home depot after it's been in the paper so many times for such actions!
Originally posted by Maluhia
reply to post by the5thcape
is a home depot where alot of drug dealers get busted and police patrol it and get lucky often(I don't get why any dealer would go to a home depot after it's been in the paper so many times for such actions!
Wow and yet the feds haven't gone after Home Depot?? hhhmmm.
Originally posted by FTD Brat
Geeze, doesn't sound too different than trying to shut down an arms manufacturer that is known for "Saturday Night Specials."
With legislation like SOPA these days that would allow the owners of a website to be held completely liable for anything and everything being posted on their site, it doesn't surprise me that the DoJ would be going after a Motel simply because it's known as a location for drug deals.
The police kick-back just adds insult to injury.
Whatever became of Our right to be safe from unreasonable seizure...?