posted on Jan, 1 2012 @ 03:43 PM
reply to post by Algernonsmouse
Can you show me one anti-smoking law that was passed just to make smokers lives more isolated. That exact criteria and you need to back it
If you mean laws passed that have the effect of making enjoyment of societal activities difficult for smokers, and which override a property-owners
right to set policy on their property, you need look no farther than this
If you mean a law that states, in those exact words used, that its intent is to socially isolate smokers, no. No law is going to phrase things that
You apparently haven't noticed that I failed to reply to your last posts. That was not an oversight. I exposed you for the type of irrelevant
conclusions you make based on grammatical and linguistic points only. No further debate is either productive or desirable for me because of this.
I might point out that I just vehemently disagreed with Awoken4Ever, but we both presented our side of the debate, countered each others arguments,
and in the end parted friends. That is how debate works, not by trivializing or demonizing one's opponent, not by making talking points out of typos
or misspellings, but by comparing and supporting one's views.
Because otherwise all I am reading from you is...
Just to make you feel better...
Whaaaaaaaaaaa, people dirty look me when I blow smoke in their face at dinner whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
I hope that makes you feel better.
(Oh, I would like to thank you for giving me the incentive to post a list of
to some of the studies done. Other readers might find them interesting.)