It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Glargod
reply to post by PhoenixOD
I understand that with what we "know", it is a balanced equation.
I am trying take the position that something else which "we don't know" is a part of the equation.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by Frira
If you wish to blend science and faith you are welcome to do so, this is simply the improper forum for it.
I have no problems with him posting, it simply belongs elsewhere, such as the philosophy and metaphysics forum perhaps. If you can show me the actual science in his post, please do, I don't see it.
Originally posted by Glargod
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
I don't want to be a killjoy. but this is a science forum, where is the science that shows this soul/spirit energy exists? As it is this looks like a ripe candidate for the philosophy forum. Oh and to answer there is no signifigance. Einsteins equation works as written, meaning your equation does not work, unless you prove it does.
I thought scientists were opened minded.
I thought science was about new discoveries
In your case, I guess that I must make an exclusion to my belief
Originally posted by chocise
Also,
E = hf
so, hf = mc2
which gives an expression for mass as hf/c^2
... a product of frequency, wavelength and the speed of light! No particles!
Originally posted by Frira
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by Frira
If you wish to blend science and faith you are welcome to do so, this is simply the improper forum for it.
The problem is not "blending" or "marrying" science and faith-- the problem is divorcing them or ignoring one in lieu of the other.
Likewise, I do not choose music or language-- I choose both.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by Frira
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by Frira
If you wish to blend science and faith you are welcome to do so, this is simply the improper forum for it.
The problem is not "blending" or "marrying" science and faith-- the problem is divorcing them or ignoring one in lieu of the other.
Likewise, I do not choose music or language-- I choose both.
Music is a form of language/expression. Are you saying science is a form of faith? If so, I think we are done here. If not, your analogy is worthless.
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by Frira
You seem to be suggesting that there is the prospect of a merger.
That could be disastrous. Imagine the monolithic weight ...
Originally posted by TheRedneck
reply to post by BellaMente
One thing you did miss: the gamma value only applies to observed mass. That's not to say your equation is not accurate, but that it is relativistic. This application does open up the possibility of zero-point energy and is a regular visitor to my thoughts.
It also brings up the relevant question: since all mass is relative to observed velocity, is E=mc² at all applicable without the inclusion of the gamma value?
Nice post.
TheRedneck
The laws of relativity show how to transform apparent quantities in various inertial reference frames.
Originally posted by mbkennel
Originally posted by chocise
Also,
E = hf
so, hf = mc2
which gives an expression for mass as hf/c^2
... a product of frequency, wavelength and the speed of light! No particles!
This is wrong, because there's a difference between understanding physics and superficial manipulation and equating two quantities only because they have the same units.
The statement E=hf is about the energy of a single photon, intrinsically quantized, because there is Planck's constant in there. E=mc^2 is about the energy equivalent assigned to the rest mass of a particle. Photons have zero rest mass. More generally E^2=p^2*c^2 + m^2 c^4, and this works even with electromagnetic waves (with no rest mass) because (even classically) they do have momentum without rest mass.
Therefore for a photon, where E=h*f you can then take E=p*c (as m=0) and get p = h*f/c.
Now this is interesting, as it means that per photon, the higher frequency the more momentum it has. Roughly it leads one to understand why X-rays and gamma rays are damaging to the molecules making up humans, and lower frequency E&M radiation is much less damaging: high frequency photons have enough energy & momentum to knock out individual electrons from atoms and cause substantial chemical changes as a result.
Originally posted by Fromabove
Both the magnet and gravity draw in, but to have an equality, something must flow back out at the same time.
edit on 3-3-2012 by Fromabove because: (no reason given)