It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Adyta
Originally posted by OwenGP185
Because guns are a solutions to mankinds problems...
Because racism is a solution to mankinds problems...
I am curious as to where you come from, let me guess you are in the US?
Guns can be the solution to some problems. If I recall correctly they were the solution to a rather unpleasant infestation a few hundred years ago.
Racism is wrong, I get that... but being jailed for it is even worse.
Originally posted by Revelation11
Let's be honest here England and America are just as bad as each other-With the second Amendment being false flagged and people getting offended because 'their not PC enough'.
Most in the Northerners still do own guns,but they don't use them...
_____________________________________________________________________
I know that America originally was supposed to be a carbon copy of Britain...I just forgot to mention it in earlier posts...No harm done...Right?
Don't forget that the 'Americans' were the ones that wrote A BILL on it (NDAA).I don't even think North Korea does that,they just do it...
I'm still allowed to own guns, and the last time I checked the racist old man next door wasn't in prison. I'd say you are far worse off. Your northerners may have their antique blunderbusses, but how many people do you know that legally own a handgun, or assault rifle?
Originally posted by OwenGP185
Shame the Indians did not have guns aswell then.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
I respect your concern, but do you know each and everyone of these people that had their homes raided? I doubt you do.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
I'm sure there were some trouble makers, but the UK police have a habit of charging people with terrorist offenses over minor infractions.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
I have had various members from the UK pass this information on to me, as I have seen much documentation. I'm not saying there were not rioters, but I think you're missing the point.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
The police coordinated a raid where they busted into 100 homes, this is as the police have just been granted special powers that people thought they would never exercise,
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
I think this is just a warm up. I hope I'm wrong for your sake and the rest of you who live in the UK.
Originally posted by luxbaclos1
But watch out you crims. The Police (and Army) do have the right to shoot those who endanger the lives of others. This is covered by the UK Laws of Engagement and is quite legal.
The Police did not use CS Gas, rubber bullets or water cannon during the riots which they were perfectly entitled to do. For me, that shows great restraint on behalf of those charged with keeping public order.
So now we have bleeding heat liberals bleating about CCTV and the sentences meated out to those who broke the law.
As the old saying goes, "If you can't do the time, don't do the crime!"
Originally posted by angelchemuel
Let's not forget that these riots kicked off with the police shootig an unarmed man....which has been proven I believe.
Originally posted by trustnothing
Sadly we are years ahead of America with regards to the police state, most CCTV covered country in the world I believe, no guns, terror laws being wrongly applied to increase detention times without charge etc etc
And as a non-resident, I am sure you know nothing about this at all, but you still have an opinion on it.
"Police have been given enhanced powers to act against protests at the Olympics since the Games were awarded to London six years ago, including the right to enter private homes and seize political posters. "
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by stumason
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
I respect your concern, but do you know each and everyone of these people that had their homes raided? I doubt you do.
And as a non-resident, I am sure you know nothing about this at all, but you still have an opinion on it.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
I'm sure there were some trouble makers, but the UK police have a habit of charging people with terrorist offenses over minor infractions.
Do they? Evidence please. Specific cases as well, not some "my mate said" nonsense. Once we know what you're on about, we can address it.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
I have had various members from the UK pass this information on to me, as I have seen much documentation. I'm not saying there were not rioters, but I think you're missing the point.
Clearly you're missing the point. On the basis of evidence gathered, the Police will have ID'd those they want to arrest, they then go to a Magistrate to obtain a warrant which can only be granted with evidence. These people are suspected as having been involved in riots that destroyed property and endagered lives.
If they are innocent, or if the Police have the wrong house (which does happen)n then they will walk free and have the Police pay for the cost of cleaning up the mess. In fact, the Police have to pay regardless of "innocence" to secure the property after they force entry, but that's a side point...
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
The police coordinated a raid where they busted into 100 homes, this is as the police have just been granted special powers that people thought they would never exercise,
What special powers? They've just lost a lot of the anti-terrorism powers that Blair gave them. This 100-home raid could have been planned with existing powers, they don't need new ones.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
I think this is just a warm up. I hope I'm wrong for your sake and the rest of you who live in the UK.
Warm up for what? Let me put this in perspective for you...
The latest report into the Summer violence and the Police response says that the Police need, at a minimum, an advantage of 3-1 in numbers in order to restore order and make arrests in a riot situation. They clearly had no control over relatively small crowds for several days until they mustered tens of thousands of Police from surrounding forces. There are only 150K Police in the UK and these numbers will likely fall over the next 5 years, so exactly what is it they are planning?
I really fail to see what is your hinting at here. Some iditos that burned down homes and business got nabbed and you're bitching about a Police state? Sod off, if they were involved they got what they deserved.
Originally posted by lampsalot
Originally posted by Panic2k11
reply to post by LondonerBLV
I agree but the blame is misplaced on the individual, the blame is on society. In its inequalities and marketing of consumerism.
I am against riots, but I find it so infuriating that the general public got so outraged over a few thugs stealing plasma TVs, like it was mass murder or something. Are we that tragically materialistic? Aren't there better things to get angry over?
Originally posted by trustnothing They are also guilty of abusing their stop and search powers granted to assist terrorism prevention. Here are some examples
londonphotographers.org...
www.oxfordmail.co.uk...
www.guardian.co.uk...
www.dailymail.co.uk...
Originally posted by luxbaclos1
I personally do not give a stuff how they have been identified, arrested or put in prison.