It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Samuelis
Originally posted by TupacShakur
Clearly there's no getting through to you guys, but really, just think about it for a second. When people die, they report having strange visions and seeing interesting things. When people die, their brain releases a chemical that causes hallucinations. This isn't rocket science.
In many cases the brain is reported to be completely inactive. For a chemical response to occurr wouldn't there need to be some activity? Absolutly false and closed minded answer.
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Originally posted by angellicview
Originally posted by buni11687
reply to post by angellicview
Ive found the subject of NDE's interesting, but have never really gotten in-depth into the subject. I have heard that '___' may be a cause of the visions, but I have one question about that.
If you are dead, then how can you percieve hallucinations? How can the brain remember what happened while you are dead, if it is dead?
You can't. Like the part of the OP that tells about a woman who was reading zero brain waves. Thanks for pointing out that connection.
What!? The brain doesn't stop sending signals for a while after the body dies. You are claiming to present fact but you dont know that??
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
reply to post by angellicview
No. At this point it would not be found in a textbook. But someday it will.
Well, until then you have no leg to stand on in making a case for their existence.
There are cases, as stated in the OP, of people who were dead for a long time and came back. Also, ones where there was ZERO brain waves on the EEG. Complete clinical death and brain death. It's in the OP.
The OP says there is scientific evidence. And there is. It doesn't say there is proof.
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
reply to post by angellicview
The OP says there is scientific evidence. And there is. It doesn't say there is proof.
Show me the scientific evidence. I see a lot of people who claim to have experienced the same thing. In no way is a personal experience scientific evidence.
Some of the evidence is presented on that very first post that right at the top of page one.
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
reply to post by angellicview
Some of the evidence is presented on that very first post that right at the top of page one.
That is not scientific evidence. That is a personal experience. You cant even admit the difference between personal and scientific and you expect me to take you seriously?
Scientific evidence has no universally accepted definition but generally refers to evidence which serves to either support or counter a scientific theory or hypothesis. Such evidence is generally expected to be empirical and properly documented in accordance with scientific method such as is applicable to the particular field of inquiry. Standards for evidence may vary according to whether the field of inquiry is among the natural sciences or social sciences[citation needed]. Evidence may involve understanding all steps of a process, or one or a few observations, or observation and statistical analysis of many samples without necessarily understanding the mechanism.
Originally posted by Samuelis
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
reply to post by angellicview
Some of the evidence is presented on that very first post that right at the top of page one.
That is not scientific evidence. That is a personal experience. You cant even admit the difference between personal and scientific and you expect me to take you seriously?
What kind of evidence are you looking for? A video of the afterlife? A picture of the magic fountain?
What kind of evidence are you looking for? A video of the afterlife? A picture of the magic fountain?
I was really racking my head to think of what MORE evidence I could possibly give this guy? lol.... there's really a LOT of it out there!
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
reply to post by angellicview
I was really racking my head to think of what MORE evidence I could possibly give this guy? lol.... there's really a LOT of it out there!
A lot? No, cause if there were it would be considered fact. What dont you get about that?
Originally posted by angellicview
Here is the entire list of evidence - some of it is objective, some subjective - that is reported on this one website. You can click the link if you'd like to read more about each piece. I used the same site for the information because they have done a lot of research and put it all together neatly for us. There are many other websites, books, and videos that also add to the information presented here.
(1) People have NDEs while they are brain dead.
(2) Out-of-body perception during NDEs have been verified.
(3) People born blind can see during an NDE.
(4) NDEs demonstrate the return of consciousness from death.
(5) The NDE study by Raymond Moody has been replicated.
(6) Experimental evidence suggests that NDEs are real.
(7) NDEs can be considered to be an objective experience.
(8) NDEs have been validated in scientific studies.
(9) Out-of-body experiences (OBEs) have been validated in scientific studies.
(10) Autoscopy during NDEs have been validated in scientific studies.
(11) A transcendental "sixth sense" of the human mind has been found.
(12) NDEs support the "holonomic" theory of consciousness.
(13) The expansion of consciousness reported in NDEs supports consciousness theories.
(14) The brain's connection to a greater power has been validated by indisputable scientific facts.
(15) The replication of NDEs using hallucinogenic drugs satisfies the scientific method.
(16) NDEs are different from hallucinations.
(17) The replication of NDEs using a variety of triggers satisfies the scientific method.
(18) Apparitions of the deceased have been induced under scientific controls.
(19) People having NDEs have brought back scientific discoveries.
(20) NDEs have advanced the field of medical science.
(21) NDEs have advanced the field of psychology.
(22) NDEs correspond to the "quirky" principles found in quantum physics.
(23) The transcendental nature of human consciousness during NDEs corresponds to principles found in quantum physics.
(24) NDEs have advanced the fields of philosophy and religion.
(25) NDEs have the nature of an archetypal initiatory journey.
(26) People have been clinically dead for several days and report the most profound NDEs.
(27) NDEs have produced visions of the future which later prove to be true.
(28) Groups of dying people can share the same NDE.
(29) Experiencers are convinced the NDE is an afterlife experience.
(30) The NDEs of children are remarkably similar to adult NDEs.
(31) Experiencers of NDEs are profoundly changed in ways that cannot occur from hallucinations and dreams.
(32) NDEs cannot be explained merely by brain chemistry alone.
(33) NDEs have been reported by people since the dawn of recorded history.
(34) The skeptical "dying brain" theory of NDEs has serious flaws.
(35) Skeptical arguments against the NDE "survival theory" are not valid.
(36) The burden of proof has shifted to the skeptics of the survival theory.
(37) Other anomalous phenomena supports the survival theory.
(38) NDEs support the existence of reincarnation.
(39) The scientific evidence supporting reincarnation also supports the survival theory.
(40) Xenoglossy supports reincarnation and the survival theory.
(41) Past-life regression supports reincarnation and the survival theory.
(42) Contact with "the deceased" has occurred under scientific controls.
(43) After-death communications have been reported by credible people.
(44) Dream research supports the NDE and survival theory.
(45) Deathbed visions support the NDE and survival theory.
(46) Remote viewing supports the NDE and survival theory.
(47) The efficacy of prayer has been demonstrated under scientific controls.
(48) The "Scole Experiments" during the 1990s support the NDE and survival theory.
(49) Electronic voice phenomena (EVP) supports the NDE and survival theory.
(50) Prominent atheists have had NDEs which caused them to believe in the afterlife.
(51) Psychometry supports the NDE and survival theory.
The most ignored facts that NDE cynics gloss over are those that occur in the out-of-body phase of the NDE. There is no way possible that brain chemistry can be argued when a person is verifiably DEAD, yet can tell everyone later what was said or happening down the hall, away from sight and earshot, during the time of resuscitation efforts. Rather than try to incorporate this unexplainable information into a new theory, these facts are merely ignored. In actuality a separation of consciousness from the body is a much more plausible explanation of facts to account for what is being reported by NDErs.
Additional indicators of reliability of anecdotal evidence is 1) the number of eyewitnesses, 2) the consistency of the observations and claims, 3) the credibility of the witnesses, 4) the clarity of and proximity of the observations, 5) the state of mind of the witnesses, and 6) what does the experiencer or the cynic stand to gain from the experience.[17] While a single NDE may not be proof of the phenomena itself, there are hundreds of NDE accounts. Many times they share certain observations and claims. Moreover, it might be easy to discount one or several people as being mentally unstable, but it becomes less believable when a person wants to claim that all of these people are guilty of false memories or other memory disorders. Experiencers have a wide cross-section of people to poll from. They come from all walks of life, ages, ethnic backgrounds, socio-economic status, and countries. There is no discounting the reliability of that much evidence as the result of being mistaken, lying, false memories, or hallucinations. Few NDErs have anything to gain by telling their story.