To begin,, I did use the Search Option. MODS: Please move if in the wrong location, Thank You.
I'm Sure I'll Get The,,,,,, "Why Do You Need To Tell The MODS Their Job",,,,,, Reply.
If that is your comment, Stay Home!
Now, I understand this woman as 15 kids and 12 are living with her from 3 different fathers.
OK, She has been a burden on the tax payers for some time now.
Also she as been in jail and had her kids taking away for 10 or more months before.
BUT!!!! She is allowed to continue to have children!
Now get this, she is Upset Because She Has All These Kids and Somebody Needs To Take Care Of Them and Her!!!
That Right,,, She was Evicted from her home for breaking the agreement and it's the Tax Payers fault!
Should the Tax Payers continue to support her?
Here's a Quote from the comments section:
Back in the 60's when Barry Goldwater was running for POTUS, he commented that if a woman has a child
out of wedlock, she should receive government help. If she has 2 children out of wedlock, she should still receive help, but in order to get that
help, be ordered to attend classes that talk with her about responsibility and given birth control help and information. If same woman then has 3rd
child out of wedlock, she should have her tubes tied or forgo any government help. Now, to show that media outlets were just as bad back then, a
bi-line in papers read; "Goldwater against motherhood".
Agree or Not?
edit on 1-12-2011 by guohua because: spelling and link check
edit on 1-12-2011 by guohua because: (no reason given)
Its simple: STOP HAVING KIDS!!!! If your irresponsible enough to have that many kids knowing you cant afford to take care of them then it is YOUR
fault and nobody elses. I say let her take care of them on her own and if she cant...tough! People need to stop having kids thats the bottom line!
If a kid can be taken from the parents because it's too fat, or because the parent's don't vaccinate, then these kids should be removed because
their mother is incapable of self-control. I hate to see these kids suffering, but something needs to be done. Personally, I feel if you're on
government assistance, you should also be on something like Norplant, and any man on welfare caught fathering a child should be forced to have a
vasectomy. If you're incapable of taking care of yourself, on your own, without government/tax payer assistance, you should NOT be allowed to have
more kids! It's not politically correct to be personally responsible though, is it?
Even though education sounds great....it rarely works. I know because I have tried and tried to educate people like her more than I can count. These
type of folks are unable to be educated. The wiring in their brains are scrambled.
What she needs is to get off the pipe or tonic and on some appropriate psych meds....
I agree tie them tubes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! She is out of control so are alot of people 2 or 3 kids I see fine we all like to
experience parenthood. Then be responsible and tie the tubes. We had two kids and tied the knots times are tough I can't expect other people to raise
my kids. Now some help from time to time(that does not mean living on the couch watching tv) is ok but my kids are my responsibility. peace out...
I for one pity her ingnorance, but i do believe we are all our brothers keepers. As long as i have the power to ill help those who deserve it. Be it
with a basket of food or a belt to the rear. I only find it unfortunate that the state hasnt invented a better method for re-educating these
people.... Lest we create a subclass of society were All the idiots have been doin it like rabbits in mountain caves for a thousand years.
As technology advances the old preconceptions of limited recources and competition have to fall away and be replaced. We dont need a bunch of
disgruntled competitive immortals slinging galaxy crushing weapons at eachother.
The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.
All content copyright 2014, The Above Network, LLC.