It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
HOW MUCH OF THIS NOVEL IS TRUE?
The Da Vinci Code is a novel and therefore a work of fiction. While the book's characters and their actions are obviously not real, the artwork, architecture, documents, and secret rituals depicted in this novel all exist (for example, Leonardo Da Vinci's paintings, the Louvre pyramid, the Gnostic Gospels, Hieros Gamos, etc.). These real elements are interpretted and debated by fictional characters. While it is my belief that the theories discussed by these characters have merit, each individual reader must explore these characters' viewpoints and come to his or her own interpretations. My hope in writing this novel was that the story would serve as a catalyst and a springboard for people to discuss the important topics of faith, religion, and history.
Originally posted by parker
I think it is posible through the use of various methods to view the chalis and its location but why, all you would see is a very old vessel and the suroundings of its location. I dont believe it would hold any magical power and in the end be challenged by most to be non ethentic. what would be the purpose of truly finding this item?.
Parker
Originally posted by NuTroll
unless jesus had a really large kidney stone this topic is really pointless.
it was the breaking of the bread and the pouring of the wine that is in memory in him.
Originally posted by Toelint
I was just looking at a copy of The Last Supper by Leonardo De Vinci. Guess What? There is NO CHALIS...NO WINE GLASSES....on the table at all.
Originally posted by NotTooHappy
Originally posted by Toelint
I was just looking at a copy of The Last Supper by Leonardo De Vinci. Guess What? There is NO CHALIS...NO WINE GLASSES....on the table at all.
Leonardo wasn't there when the last supper occured, if it did occur, which I doubt, so this proves nothing.
[edit on 11/23/04 by NotTooHappy]