It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"'(President Muhammad) Khatami speaks of the dialogue between civilizations, and I have grave doubts about this. It is a dubious idea. We do not want to take over the British Embassy, since they (the British) have already cleared the embassy of documents; we must take over Britain [itself].'
"After [H.A.] harshly attacked Khatami and the reformists, he said in his speech: 'The West sees us as terrorists, and depicts our strategy as terrorism and repression. Had our youth agreed to Khatami's teachings and interpretations, it would never have fought the arrogance, and would never have defended the holy places � because Khatami speaks always of being conciliatory, of patience, and of rejecting terrorism, while we defend [the line of] toughness and war against the enemies of revolutionary Islam. I take pride in my actions that cause anxiety and fear to the Americans.
"'Haven't the Jews and the Christians achieved their progress by means of toughness and repression? We have a strategy drawn up for the destruction of Anglo-Saxon civilizationand for the uprooting of the Americans and the English.
"'Our missiles are now ready to strike at their civilization, and as soon as the instructions arrive from Leader ['Ali Khamenei], we will launch our missiles at their cities and installations. Our motto during the war (in Iraq) was: Karbala, we are coming, Jerusalem, we are coming. And because of Khatami's policies and dialogue between the civilizations, we have been compelled to freeze our plan to liberate the Islamic cities. And now we are [again] about to carry out the program.'
Originally posted by The Big O
Yeah. I highly doubt Iran has missles that are cappable of hitting us, Nukes or not.
And if they did, there would be no Iran left.
Any country that uses a nuke in a hositle attack like what you said Iran was going to do would be destroyed by not only us, but any other country worth a **** on this planet.
A scenario more likely is something similar to what happened in The Sum of All Fears. Missles, on the other hand, is just not realistic for them as of yet. Maybe someday in the future, but not now.
Originally posted by jazzmaster
Why would they want to use nukes against us? The chance of hitting us would be next to none. We have a defense system against ballistic missles, it's called AIRBORNE LASER. They also have ground version. WIth a little of thinking, they could hit us with conventional weapons from inside the US. They could blow up another building or train staion with ease.
Originally posted by zi2525
ITs kind of funny hearing people tout about how an attack on the U.S would result in the attacking country being blown to peices. I dont think so. One reason is U.S wether they like it or not have to be the "better" people and not attack civilians. Also people tend to forget how confused and how bad communication and response time was during september 11th, no one even the military had a freakin clue of what to do or where to go, even though they new there where still hi jacked planes in the air.
A 2 way assualt would put a whole in the U.S like you could never imagine, imagine 3 buildings and 2 train stations getting hit from inside, then quick missle attacks (and u.s missle defence truly is not that great, they cant shut enough missles down to stop the attack completely.) You underestimate other forces and over estimate your own. Not to mention you have no idea which country is pushing iran to do this, North Korea maybe? Or china, making your troops consentrate so much on the arab /persian world and then invading tiawan and making America look like idiots becouse they can not aid an allie.
Originally posted by Mirthful Me
Originally posted by jazzmaster
Why would they want to use nukes against us? The chance of hitting us would be next to none. We have a defense system against ballistic missles, it's called AIRBORNE LASER. They also have ground version. WIth a little of thinking, they could hit us with conventional weapons from inside the US. They could blow up another building or train staion with ease.
Could you please provide a link to verify the operational status of these systems? I would like to sleep soundly tonight.
The goal of the Missile Defense Agency, which has overall management responsibility for the program, and the Airborne Laser System Program Office at Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M., is to have YAL-1A ready to shoot down a threat-representative ballistic missile by December 2004.
During a recent test conducted on Aug. 24, 2004 the system shot down multiple mortar rounds, demonstrating potential its battlefield application for to protection against common threats. The test represented actual mortar threat scenarios. Targets were intercepted by the THEL testbed and destroyed; both single mortar rounds and salvo were tested.
Originally posted by zi2525
ITs kind of funny hearing people tout about how an attack on the U.S would result in the attacking country being blown to peices. I dont think so. One reason is U.S wether they like it or not have to be the "better" people and not attack civilians. Also people tend to forget how confused and how bad communication and response time was during september 11th, no one even the military had a freakin clue of what to do or where to go, even though they new there where still hi jacked planes in the air.
A 2 way assualt would put a whole in the U.S like you could never imagine, imagine 3 buildings and 2 train stations getting hit from inside, then quick missle attacks (and u.s missle defence truly is not that great, they cant shut enough missles down to stop the attack completely.) You underestimate other forces and over estimate your own. Not to mention you have no idea which country is pushing iran to do this, North Korea maybe? Or china, making your troops consentrate so much on the arab /persian world and then invading tiawan and making America look like idiots becouse they can not aid an allie.
Originally posted by The Big O
Yeah. I highly doubt Iran has missles that are cappable of hitting us, Nukes or not.
Originally posted by Mirthful Me
Originally posted by jazzmaster
Why would they want to use nukes against us? The chance of hitting us would be next to none. We have a defense system against ballistic missles, it's called AIRBORNE LASER. They also have ground version. WIth a little of thinking, they could hit us with conventional weapons from inside the US. They could blow up another building or train staion with ease.
Could you please provide a link to verify the operational status of these systems? I would like to sleep soundly tonight.
The laser could be in use in 2007
Originally posted by naked_turk
The ABL is not yet operational, guys!
Originally posted by muppet
It seems like the extremists in Iran are a bit annoyed with their Governments pesky dialogue, and attempts to build peaceful conciliatory diplomatic links with the west. The Moderate Khatami government is in a tricky position, with an ever growing pro-democracy movement on the one side, and a desparate but still powerful extremist element on the other..
I guess what I'm saying is don't always take statements like these as :-
- The truth
- Representative of the Iranian government
- Representative of the Iranian people
IMHO I'd say these threats are none of the above.
Originally posted by RabidGoose
I highly doubt Iran will make a move, at all. This is just them blowng hot air to make the Extremist feel better about themselves. Extremist probably threaten the governments for not giving any action, once in awhile they say 'America is bad' and the Extremist shut up.