It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Paul
I think that the UK is a Union very much worth preserving.
Far too many English people are dismissive on this issue, saying "let them go, we'd be better off without them". As earlier pointed out by Nerdling and Muppet, neither party would be better off.
One could argue that if the Scottish people vote for devolution, then it should happen.
This is fair enough - after all, we are a democracy.
The problem here lies with the fact that the case for devolution is being pushed by parties that resemble pressure groups, pushing an almost one policy agenda. They will play on peoples nationalistic side, creating division, and corralling people into voting for independance,
just as our government is trying to corral us into taking the European currency.
Originally posted by Chris McGee
Translation: When it believes it can win, it will put the question to a referendum.
Originally posted by TrueLies
it's bad enough that the whole world is becoming a monoculture,
Originally posted by TrueLies
why keep lumping country into country, this eu thing is screaming of monoculture.
Originally posted by UK Wizard
I however want the UK united but i also want the diverse traditions and cultures of England, Scotland and Wales to be kept, as it is they which give the UK its true character and spirit.
Originally posted by TrueLies
(i'm never sure how to refer to you guys! sorry)
Originally posted by TrueLies
Melting pot countries seem to always bend towards a monoculutre full of corporate fast lane ideas and products which turn into a culture of it's own, and it's not unique or special to the people.
Originally posted by TrueLies
I really think it's important for people to hold onto their culture and not cave into the above mentioned.
Originally posted by UK Wizard
Originally posted by TrueLies
why keep lumping country into country, this eu thing is screaming of monoculture.
Don't let sminkeypinkey hear you say that
Originally posted by Patriot
The UK compliments each other by there ability as separate nations to coincide under one entity. We are both recognised in the international community as the UK, a modern force that has changed the world and by our separate nations.
United Kingdom
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Island has a proud and cultural identity. Many people believe in shunning the heritage of individual countries (England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Island), they believe we will be more united if we shed our historical identity of a union of many countries. These people would greatly prefer if the United Kingdom used the countries as mere reference points on a map. There are other people at the opposite end of the spectrum, these people want to shed the United identity that we have forged together, they want separate countries with their own separate identities and peoples.
I fall in the moderate yet proud section of ideals when the identity United Kingdom is debated. I believe in a strong and proud (non-nationalistic) United Kingdom, but I also believe in celebrating the identities of each individual country that makes up the United Kingdom. The United Kingdom is stronger for having the united yet separate identities of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Island.
Individual Countries of the United Kingdom
The United Kingdom is a nation full of politically apathetic people, why are they apathetic, it is because the main stream parties have forgotten that the British Isles is made up of the Scotland, Wales and England.
Many people wish to carve England up into regions, therefore eroding the identity of England and turning us all into regionalised members of the United Kingdom.
I used to be in favour of a Government for England, I believed it would grant England more power and self-respect but it looks like I was wrong. Both Scotland and Wales have been granted their own 'Governments' and it doesn't have seemed to have worked well for them, inefficiency and needless waste is all that they seemed to have got from it. I believe granting the traditional counties of the United Kingdom more power rather than creating a self governing parliament for each country would help bring government powers back to the people, without the needless waste of single country Government.
I propose simple non-wasteful measures of giving Scotland, Wales and England back their identity:
* Officially acknowledge the national identity of 'Scottish', 'Welsh' and 'English', allowing people to choose their identity as 'Scottish', 'Welsh' or 'English' on the national census and forms that require nationality.
* Officially acknowledge the National Anthems of England, Scotland and Wales.
* Matters that affect only England can only be voted upon by English constituency MP's vice-versa concerning Scotland and Wales.
* Ending of all attempts to regionalise England, Scotland and Wales.
* Greater use of county Government in England, Scotland and Wales.
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Island has a proud and cultural identity. Many people believe in shunning the heritage of individual countries (England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Island), they believe we will be more united if we shed our historical identity of a union of many countries.
These people would greatly prefer if the United Kingdom used the countries as mere reference points on a map. There are other people at the opposite end of the spectrum, these people want to shed the United identity that we have forged together, they want separate countries with their own separate identities and peoples.
I fall in the moderate yet proud section of ideals when the identity United Kingdom is debated. I believe in a strong and proud (non-nationalistic) United Kingdom, but I also believe in celebrating the identities of each individual country that makes up the United Kingdom. The United Kingdom is stronger for having the united yet separate identities of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Island.
The United Kingdom is a nation full of politically apathetic people, why are they apathetic, it is because the main stream parties have forgotten that the British Isles is made up of the Scotland, Wales and England.
Many people wish to carve England up into regions, therefore eroding the identity of England and turning us all into regionalised members of the United Kingdom.
I used to be in favour of a Government for England, I believed it would grant England more power and self-respect but it looks like I was wrong. Both Scotland and Wales have been granted their own 'Governments' and it doesn't have seemed to have worked well for them, inefficiency and needless waste is all that they seemed to have got from it.
I believe granting the traditional counties of the United Kingdom more power rather than creating a self governing parliament for each country would help bring government powers back to the people, without the needless waste of single country Government.
I propose simple non-wasteful measures of giving Scotland, Wales and England back their identity:
* Officially acknowledge the national identity of 'Scottish', 'Welsh' and 'English', allowing people to choose their identity as 'Scottish', 'Welsh' or 'English' on the national census and forms that require nationality.
* Officially acknowledge the National Anthems of England, Scotland and Wales.
* Matters that affect only England can only be voted upon by English constituency MP's vice-versa concerning Scotland and Wales.
* Ending of all attempts to regionalise England, Scotland and Wales.
* Greater use of county Government in England, Scotland and Wales.
www.freewebs.com...
There are my ideas....have fun ripping them apart
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
(I dare you to try this one out on a Cornishman or a Yorkshireman some day Wizard.....in person! )
I suggest this is comment about "inefficiency" and "needless waste" is simply all about the cost over-runs of the Assembly/Parliament buildings.
It's true that the public in Scotland do not see the Parliament as perfection - but then what could be? - and have felt alienated by the increased cost of the Holyrood building but when asked about the detail of what the Parliament has actually done the results are very much more positive.
- What woukld you do Wizard, try to roll back devolution?
I'd like to see you try and maintain any kind of UK if you did.
How do you propose imposing this Wizard?
Why would the Scots or Welsh want to give up their Welsh Assembly (for which the demand is for ever greater power, not less) or Scottish Parliament (ditto) for a few mere frills?
Sorry but this is pipe-dream time IMHO.
You're a young guy and you're giving this stuff some serious thought, I applaud you for that (just don't over-do it and waste your youth obsessing about stuff that will keep until you are older
Decentralised power is not 'weakness' or 'less', genuinely 'empowering' the individual - in a meaningful sense - is the direction our democracy has been heading for a long long time.
......and if you want to relate it to a wider issue how come you like devolved power in the nations of Europe yet you prefer centralised power in the UK?
Originally posted by UK Wizard
Well both are 'countys' so both would benefit over my proposals, which is to give county's more power.
It is one of the reasons yes.
A couple of months ago 'Question Time' was in Scotland where the auidence was quite hostile to the Scottish parliament, they claimed it had not benefitted them and had created extra costs to them in both long and short term.
Indeedy.
I don't see why.
Through offering the people of England, Wales and Scotland an alternative to regionalisation and their burocratic mini-parliment.
Everything starts as a pipe dream.....
Depends what you mean by waste, to me re-kindeling Britain is a worthy cause.
My ideas do involve de-centralising power but rather than setting up country parliment, i would prefer county micro-parliaments.
I don't prefer a centralised power in the UK, i want power devolved to the countys not country governments.
Indeedy.
Originally posted by UK Wizard
Or instead of building new wasteful building, the current infrastrucutre and buildings could be reformed and upgraded.
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
- Wizard is your complaint mainly that Wales and Scotland built an Assembly and a Parliament building fitted to their need and that this turned out to be expensive and not free of charge?
As for the rest? Are your micro-Parliaments really just slightly souped-up Town Halls?
.....and you have failed to give any indication as to what level of power you imagine these micro-Parliaments exercising and how this would relate to Westminster.
Originally posted by UK Wizard
My main point about Scotlands parliment and the Welsh Assembly is that they conflict with the UK parliment
and they create disunity within the UK.
For example why does Scotland and Wales get a parliment and not England?
As for the rest? Are your micro-Parliaments really just slightly souped-up Town Halls?
Yup
Local issues are dealt with by the local Government, but they have to go by a national guideline, the local government should also be able to oppose plans such as immigration holding places being built within their area.
Originally posted by UK Wizard
sminkeypinkey you'll be happy to know that you've won me round on the national semi-independence issue...I'm writing a re-writen idea for my site as i type....