Britain in secret talks with Syrian rebels , page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 80 times
Topic started on 19-11-2011 @ 11:19 AM by Corruption Exposed

Britain in secret talks with Syrian rebels


www.independent.co.uk
Britain has formally opened talks with the Syrian opposition movement as international pressure continues to mount against the beleaguered regime of President Bashar al-Assad.

Frances Guy, a former ambassador to Lebanon, met members of the exiled opposition in Paris yesterday. The Foreign Secretary, William Hague, is to meet members of the Syrian opposition in London next week when they will also hold talks with senior officials in Downing Street.
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.dailymail.co.uk


reply posted on 19-11-2011 @ 11:44 AM by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by xuenchen



If they bomb Syria like they did in Libya the casualties will surely be high.

I have a feeling that TPTB will use the rebels more discreetly this time compared to Libya. I can also see Russia getting involved via proxy.

This will be interesting to watch unfold.


reply posted on 19-11-2011 @ 11:50 AM by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by TheMindWar



LOL I guess it's not really secret if the press is reporting it.

The part where they talk about supporting the rebel uprising is probably slightly secret though.


reply posted on 19-11-2011 @ 12:57 PM by pavil
reply to post by Corruption Exposed


We basically have to let Turkey take the lead role, if there is to be any "assistance" from the outside. We can help Turkey to some extent, but they need to be the lead and on board with any action. They are the regional power that is most effected by the situation going on in Syria (no offense to Israel, they can't be a player on this one). They are the ones who can bring Assad down in a heartbeat. Anyone other nation does it, it will be "meddling", Turkey can play the "Liberator" role well, with minimal loss of life. If you could get some major defections from the Syrian Army, that would go a long way to getting Assad out of power.

I would say the Arab League should take the lead, but in all reality, they can't do anything. Most of the member states have their own issues to deal with right now. Perhaps they could help some with the post Assad transition, which make no mistake is going to happen one way or the other.


reply posted on 19-11-2011 @ 01:24 PM by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by pavil



You make a very good point and I agree. If Turkey were to take care of this it would cause a lot less anger in the region. I wonder how Iran would react to that though. I think it could be the spark to the real WW3


reply posted on 19-11-2011 @ 01:55 PM by pavil
reply to post by Immune



Last I heard, the OWS weren't getting mowed down en masse by their repective Government's army.


reply posted on 19-11-2011 @ 02:01 PM by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by Immune



I agree with most of what you said, and can even appreciate how you came to the conclusion that you did and compare the OWS people to the Syrian rebels. I'm not sure that I agree with that though.

I see major differences, but as you mentioned there are also a lot of similarities so your comparison isn't that far fetched.


reply posted on 19-11-2011 @ 04:08 PM by MegaCurious
Originally posted by pavil
reply to
post by Immune



Last I heard, the OWS weren't getting mowed down en masse by their repective Government's army.


Well, no, because in Syria the "rebels" are shooting at the security forces with guns and killing them in pretty large numbers. That part hasn't happened here yet, so the army hasn't "mowed down en masse" the "rebels" here in America yet.



reply posted on 19-11-2011 @ 04:15 PM by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by MegaCurious



That's an aspect a lot of people are not thinking about. I know Assad is a dictator but I have a feeling that a lot of these rebels are part of foreign intervention. A lot of the dead (3,500) were probably armed rebel mobs who were also using violence.


reply posted on 19-11-2011 @ 04:19 PM by yourmaker
Originally posted by pavil
reply to
post by Corruption Exposed


We basically have to let Turkey take the lead role, if there is to be any "assistance" from the outside. We can help Turkey to some extent, but they need to be the lead and on board with any action. They are the regional power that is most effected by the situation going on in Syria (no offense to Israel, they can't be a player on this one). They are the ones who can bring Assad down in a heartbeat. Anyone other nation does it, it will be "meddling", Turkey can play the "Liberator" role well, with minimal loss of life. If you could get some major defections from the Syrian Army, that would go a long way to getting Assad out of power.

I would say the Arab League should take the lead, but in all reality, they can't do anything. Most of the member states have their own issues to deal with right now. Perhaps they could help some with the post Assad transition, which make no mistake is going to happen one way or the other.


it's not our fight. seriously. what happened to not intervening in other countries affairs???
and this is only happening because the idea was implanted in Tunisian, Egyptian and Libyan social media feeds.

I agree with spreading freedom, but not like this.. where we essentially sell our moral souls for power.


reply posted on 19-11-2011 @ 04:20 PM by yourmaker
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to
post by MegaCurious



That's an aspect a lot of people are not thinking about. I know Assad is a dictator but I have a feeling that a lot of these rebels are part of foreign intervention. A lot of the dead (3,500) were probably armed rebel mobs who were also using violence.


no they were protestors, protesting legit, and Assad did what any power hungry dictator does to retain that power.

the difference now is the strategy has been displaced and left up to the opposition to take the lead and become those rebels, different from libya in that we used mercs.


reply posted on 19-11-2011 @ 04:21 PM by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by TheMindWar




Yeah, we dont get to hear the juicy stuff


I'm sure we will find out eventually just by watching the events unfold.

I predict an all out civil war starting in Syria very soon.


reply posted on 19-11-2011 @ 04:25 PM by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by yourmaker




no they were protestors, protesting legit, and Assad did what any power hungry dictator does to retain that power.


In no way, shape, or form am I defending Assad's murderous regime but I'm very confident that not all the dead were "innocent" protesters. I wasn't there and neither were you so none of us know for sure.

This article discusses some of the claims by Assad that the US is intervening.

Syria regime accuses US of 'bloody events'


reply posted on 19-11-2011 @ 04:26 PM by ipleadthe5th
reply to post by Corruption Exposed



Pretty soon NATO countries will be arming these rebels whether directly or indirectly if it's not already happening.


IMO it's been happening for a while..
Many believe the CIA was arming the rebels in Libya from the outset..
Heck, they probably coordinated the whole affair IMO..


reply posted on 19-11-2011 @ 04:28 PM by yourmaker
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to
post by yourmaker




no they were protestors, protesting legit, and Assad did what any power hungry dictator does to retain that power.


In no way, shape, or form am I defending Assad's murderous regime but I'm very confident that not all the dead were "innocent" protesters. I wasn't there and neither were you so none of us know for sure.

This article discusses some of the claims by Assad that the US is intervening.

Syria regime accuses US of 'bloody events'


i watched a lot of the home videos near the start, and watched them slowly devolve into firing back which leads me to believe they were inspired themselves rather than an outside interference of sorts.

although the initial protest i still think we're an external influence,

but yes i'd like to thank you for "I wasn't there and neither were you so none of us know for sure. " you are correct and it is wrong for me to presume with 100% faith.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Israel angered over IAEA vote on nuclear arsenal
  Posted 13 days ago with 79 member flags
Neil Armstrong dead at age 82 - report
  Posted 17 days ago with 63 member flags
Judge orders release of detained Marine veteran
  Posted 19 days ago with 58 member flags
Birds hold \'funerals\' for dead
  Posted 10 days ago with 55 member flags
TSA agents swarm Ron Paul\'s plane, demand explosives check
  Posted 11 days ago with 47 member flags
Mysterious Changes in Ocean Salt Spur NASA Expedition
  Posted 1 days ago with 36 member flags
Ga. Murder Case Uncovers Terror Plot by Soldiers
  Posted 15 days ago with 32 member flags