Very interesting video. I don't grant it anymore credibility than I do any other facet of this entire 911 ordeal, from either side of the argument. I
would be interested in verifying all of her claims and seeing the evidence she claims to be able to put forth. If that involves buying a book from her
I would pass but otherwise lets do it. I am not saying I disbelieve her, but I don't believe her either.
Some contradictions taking place in her thought patterns make me wonder. For instance the supposed guy who shot down flight 93 who she mentions is in
prison in Florida. She asks the audience to help the guy out, as in help him get out of prison? Or help the system kill him faster? Are you making
a martyr of the guy that actually shot down the plane and killed the people in it at the same time as crucifying the person that ordered him to do
It would be really easy to argue either way as to if she is insane or not. She can't prove much other than that she was arrested and her apparent
phone calls with complaints to the officials from what I understand. I know that could be incorrect but I haven't been able to look further yet. Yet
the lack of evidence is easily explained, which the explanation is logically sound but that in itself makes you curious.
I wonder if we will ever really find out the absolute truth about that day. I wonder if there is anyone on the planet that actually knows the absolute
truth about that day. My guess is that the truth lies somewhere between each end of the spectrum. I know that is a cop out and that much is obvious
but how else to put it?
I would have to guess that someone (A
) really did plan and execute an attack on the WTC using hijacked planes. I would have to also guess that
) took advantage of that situation in order to further their own agenda. I would guess that any number of others
) could have known about A's
plan and probably also realized the possible benefits for themselves outweighed the detriment
of the attack. Exactly who A-Z
is I could only speculate but have no knowledge that everyone here doesn't have.
And then we did the rest ourselves by interjecting our own interpretations and rumors till no one knows for sure what is correct and what is
*edit* To add that I think the calls of disinfo agents posting in the thread are inaccurate. I haven't seen anyone that has made any blanket
statements to discredit her that couldn't be alluded to from a very brief glance at the shroud surrounding her. Just calling someone crazy isn't
really a clandestine attack to discredit her, but merely a personal observation. Don't read into it too much I suggest.
edit on 11/13/2011 by sputniksteve because: stuffs
edit on 11/13/2011 by sputniksteve because: (no reason given)