It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


CIA Asset Susan Lindauer.. Can Now Speaks 10 years after 2001-9-11

page: 1
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

+3 more 
posted on Nov, 12 2011 @ 04:21 PM
I found a lot of Susan Lindauer-threads but I don't see this particular EYE-OPENING video anywhere.

I don't know this woman and am only hearing about her now. So I am purely judging her by this video (plus reading her wiki-bio claiming she's nuts) and my gut tells me she's telling the truth. From her body language, to her quickness to answer pertinent questions, and her over all demeanor. Not to mention the fact that it MAKES sense!

So....take a deep breath, sit back, breakout the popcorn and prepare to get pissed!

uploaded Nov 11, 2011
Susan Lindauer CIA whistle blower reveals everything she knows on the dirt.

posted on Nov, 12 2011 @ 05:05 PM
can you expand on this vid for people that cant watch videos atm? that would be greatly appreciated. thanks.

posted on Nov, 12 2011 @ 05:15 PM
who knows fore sure, but her mannerisms coupled with the look in her eye make he appear mildly insane

posted on Nov, 12 2011 @ 06:00 PM
reply to post by Human_Alien

Massive video, watching it and she's talking about pre-wiring of the building around 2 august through to 4 September, Atta was supervised by the CIA as an asset, there were pre-warnings so that is why she needed to be sileneced because the attack was predicted.

Thermite bomb with potential sulphur, it creates molten steel, it's military grade stuff

*** Obviously it all needs to be checked and cross checked and I'm missing out lots of stuff. Well worth a watch, thanks

PS she's still talking about pre-warnings and fore-knowledge (which makes Condoleezza Rice look bad).

posted on Nov, 12 2011 @ 06:01 PM
Can't watch the video, which makes this thread suck., for me.

What is happening in the vid?

posted on Nov, 12 2011 @ 06:08 PM
later on she speaks of her friend dying of cancer, while laughing. Then claims she has absolutely no mental issues or inflictions of any kind. Kinda contradictory really. I don't know how to take her.

posted on Nov, 12 2011 @ 06:30 PM

Originally posted by outsidethesquare
later on she speaks of her friend dying of cancer, while laughing. Then claims she has absolutely no mental issues or inflictions of any kind. Kinda contradictory really. I don't know how to take her.

It's a defense mechanism from the stress. I've seen it before. Sometimes, the only way to deal with the pain and terror is to remember it as a relief to be gone, and to laugh about it. If you don't allow yourself to laugh, then you'll break down.

I just finished watching it, and it was very interesting. The meat of the video is as follows:

She had first-hand knowledge that the 9/11 attacks were imminent, and had personally delivered warnings a month prior to the attack. She was there during half the year while her area was under high activity, trying to track down any intel about potential attacks by airplanes on the towers.

She would correspond with people from Iraq, and they could not offer any intelligence about upcoming attacks, though it was deemed to be an imminent threat.

After 9/11, under the Patriot Act, she was detained and indicted for being an Iraq spy, though she was given no hearing, no trial, and the charges were largely secret. She was in prison for 2.5 years, and was still indicted for another 2.5 years, in which saying anything at all would be used against her in a court of law. Eventually, due to the work of a blogger releasing her psychological records, which showed that she was free of mental illness and entirely competent, the judge who finally took the hearing (which was to determine whether she would be put on brain-destroying drugs and imprisoned indefinitely) got wind of the year of psych records, and he deemed that the whole thing was ridiculous, releasing her from custody.

The other things she talks about, such as the late night un-marked vans from the week or two prior to 9/11, is all opinion or second-hand testimony, though it is still interesting.

She wrote a book which she self-published, and it contains her psych evaluations and affidavits from her father (a corporate attorney who drove 700 miles to try to visit her in prison, and was denied), as well as an explanation about everything.

I'd say that about sums it up, and it fairly concretely solidifies my suspicion that the government did expect and plan for 9/11 to happen. I am still personally not a believer in the controlled demolition theory, however.

posted on Nov, 12 2011 @ 06:47 PM
her explaination sounds credible... but the fact is that she only has clear insight, after the fact..

of course i am with her, in that i would never have tried to derail the operation, even though some of the details along with the larger plot were deduced...

but the few/several trucks from Aug 23-Sept only a speculation that they were 'wiring' the buildings beams & columns with black-ops weaponized explosives--- why wasn't normal security keen to this info & investigate?
perhaps the teams could have been identified and the hidden explosives (wi fi instead of hardwired?) revealed...
If there was a Stonewalling about investigating the Trucks & Teams & their would have become public record by now.

Cheney & his (secret) operations seems the focus to me
edit on 12-11-2011 by St Udio because: (no reason given)

posted on Nov, 12 2011 @ 08:51 PM
Thanks for sharing Human. Don't know her story but she does seem like she is telling the truth as she sees it.

The scary partfor me is the powers that the Patriot Act provides Uncle Sam; where potentially anyone can be detained, indefinately on "secret" charges.... If your Congressperson voted for that wonderful "patriotic" law, get rid of them. If you don't know if they did, find out...


posted on Nov, 12 2011 @ 09:21 PM
reply to post by 5MaveN5

That's good advice, and it's something I myself have neglected to do. As I recall, the passing of the PATRIOT Act was pretty much a formality. I think most of our lawmakers have much to answer for, the PATRIOT Act not least. It would probably be a good idea to get complete records of our congresspersons' votes and email them each a laundry list of their sins so they know precisely why we're voting them out....

posted on Nov, 12 2011 @ 11:13 PM
Here's a another umptenth eaxample of a thread where people who seek to "undermine factual premise and logic' are in the first couple of posts.

the people must sit in front of their computer and monitor the posts on this site 24/7. I wonder if they are full time employees of someobody??

posted on Nov, 12 2011 @ 11:17 PM
I just read her book "Extreme Prejudice" last week, (actually I read portions of it, couldn't stay interested).
It appears she grew up with money and relatives in positions of power such as her second cousin Andrew Card.She
claimed to be a US "asset" who worked closely with some middle eastern embassies but her anti war and pro Bin Laden statements alienated her from most diplomats. In addition she sent letters to top government officials such as Colin Powell and the White House criticizing their actions, this of course brought her under the scrutiny of the FBI.
They put her in a prison on an air force base and did some psych evaluations which indicated she was mentally unfit to stand trail. Her new book is tainted by this decision since it is now officially written by a woman with mental problems. I think some of the things she said were true but I don't see anything in her book that sheds new light on the 911 issue.

posted on Nov, 12 2011 @ 11:35 PM
reply to post by Trublbrwing

Agreed about it not shedding new light, really, but she presented that she had a year's worth of psych evaluations which showed no sign of mental illness. What does that mean?

posted on Nov, 13 2011 @ 04:36 AM
while i must admit i totally believe we were lied to about what happened on 9/11 , i think this lady is lying as well. with a short ten minute search with the magical google website i was able to find that this woman worked as a congressional staffer/aid from mid march 2002 to mid may 2002 and made a total of 8000 dollars. im 100% positive she couldnt have any of the knowledge she claims to know. im sorry i think she is full of crap.

edit: link
edit on 13-11-2011 by stumpykola because: (no reason given)

posted on Nov, 13 2011 @ 05:15 AM
Calling an individual insane is a tried, tested and successful method of discrediting anything they have to say. Much of what she does say can be verified from third party sources.

Apathy is already setting in re the crimes our political leaders have committed....just imagine how little people will care in another 15 years. There is no incentive whatsoever for our political/civic leaders to rein themselves in. There is no accountability. It will happen again...and again...and again.

posted on Nov, 13 2011 @ 05:29 AM
reply to post by Varemia

She had first-hand knowledge that the 9/11 attacks were imminent, and had personally delivered warnings a month prior to the attack.
Where is the proof of that? I'm not saying it's not true, but I don't have time to watch the video.

posted on Nov, 13 2011 @ 06:20 AM
Cheers, S&F

Wached the vid.

At one stage it looked like she was doing sign language.

I think she believe's she's telling the truth. I believe her.

posted on Nov, 13 2011 @ 09:49 AM
reply to post by stumpykola

While I am skeptical this is true due to the very low amount of fax conceived, how can you be 100% certain she is lying? Nothing is certain in this case except a story was told that could be true and could be false.

Reserve judgement for the facts.

posted on Nov, 13 2011 @ 10:06 AM
Very interesting, but once someone is compromised as an asset, then they there is always the capacity for manipulation, i believe once an asset always an asset. Also if she was a low level asset, she would not know all the details and i am sure her handler would know not ti give her information that is/was classified, i also struggle with ao many people having advance knowledge, someone would have done something to get the word out or stop it.

Mis info i.m.o

posted on Nov, 13 2011 @ 10:17 AM

Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
reply to post by Varemia

She had first-hand knowledge that the 9/11 attacks were imminent, and had personally delivered warnings a month prior to the attack.
Where is the proof of that? I'm not saying it's not true, but I don't have time to watch the video.

That was just her assertion as a witness of what she did. She described how the CIA was preparing for specifically a hijacked set of planes to hit the world trade center prior to 9/11.

I'd like to say I know whether she was lying or not, but I don't know. I don't trust her (or anyone for that matter) simply because there are people who lie so well, they don't know they're lying, but that's just me. She could be telling the truth, and it is odd that she was referring to this "prison" she was held at as another building, because apparently they held people in a "pretend" prison. That does ring somewhat delusional to me. I mean, it's possible, but that's something that is very common in less than sane people. They are made to go somewhere for their mental health, and then they rationalize it by imagining that they held some key in the grand scheme of things, and were being silenced for it.

top topics

<<   2  3  4 >>

log in