It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In February 2003, a Florida Court of Appeals unanimously agreed with an assertion by FOX News that there is no rule against distorting or falsifying the news in the United States.
Back in December of 1996, Jane Akre and her husband, Steve Wilson, were hired by FOX as a part of the Fox “Investigators” team at WTVT in Tampa Bay, Florida. In 1997 the team began work on a story about bovine growth hormone (BGH), a controversial substance manufactured by Monsanto Corporation. The couple produced a four-part series revealing that there were many health risks related to BGH and that Florida supermarket chains did little to avoid selling milk from cows treated with the hormone, despite assuring customers otherwise.
According to Akre and Wilson, the station was initially very excited about the series. But within a week, Fox executives and their attorneys wanted the reporters to use statements from Monsanto representatives that the reporters knew were false and to make other revisions to the story that were in direct conflict with the facts. Fox editors then tried to force Akre and Wilson to continue to produce the distorted story. When they refused and threatened to report Fox's actions to the FCC, they were both fired.(Project Censored #12 1997)
...............
the Florida Appeals court claimed that the FCC policy against falsification of the news does not rise to the level of a "law, rule, or regulation," it was simply a "policy." Therefore, it is up to the station whether or not it wants to report honestly.
Originally posted by RainbeauBleu
I think the dangers of TV/news/politics are far more subtle than you're stating. The stories and words are there, but the real messages are conveyed in subliminals, colors, tones and frequencies. Have you noticed that you feel weird when you watch a commercial for psychiatric drugs? I always have. I remember when it became legal to advertise drugs on television and the first ads were shown. I feel like I'm being brainwashed. Although I would NEVER take the drugs advertised, I would die for the Lunesta moth. ((just kidding....I am a bit obsessed with it when I see it for some strange reason.))
I see your points, OP. It depends on how you want to spend your life. For me, it would be a waste of time to become an expert of propaganda. I prefer the symbolic, occult, esoteric interpretation of world events which invites imagination and wonder along with some ideas that are simply far-out garbage. At least the garbage in my world makes me laugh instead of pissing me off. We all make our own choices about how we see the world. I'm not sure any view is any better than the other. Thank goodness that everyone is not like I am. That would be an unhealthy imbalance.