'Anonymous' Hacking Group Takes Down 40 Child Porn Sites, 'Darknet,' Exposes Over 1500 Users

It isn't a time to be mad, a number of sites have been taken down and people scared off of using the deep web for the time being. Its a battle won for those of us who are right in the head.

Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by OzTruth

 

You and I both know that this culture is not the same. It is more dangerous and depraved.

It's a nice little straw man you got there. but it simply doesn't apply. The level of depravity shown in the content these people trade on these networks goes FAR BEYOND what you describe.

No doubt but I think you need to learn about it more. Because it sounds like your shocked by all this. Im just giving you an insight into its origins. So I will educate you about the country you call home.

In the United States, by the 1880s, most states set the age of consent at 10-12, and in one state, Delaware, the age of consent was only 7. A New York Times article states that it was still aged 7 in Delaware in 1895.[6] Female reformers and advocates of social purity initiated a campaign in 1885 to petition legislators to raise the legal age of consent to at least 16, with ultimate goal to raise the age to 18; the campaign was successful: by 1920, almost all states had raised the age of consent to 16-18.[7][8]

Source


Does that mean you would shoot your great grandfathers too?

reply to post by Aim64C


I have no respect for people that abuse childrens PERIOD
or people that like to watch pictures of abused childrens for their own sexual pleasure
freakin disgusting

My first though about the raid i mentionned ..
+Scaring the hell out of them
+Wiping their Hard disk clean
+Destroying their computer
+Kick in the balls

i never mentionned to kill them
if we do that to all pedos will stop
rest of them should go in prison

reply to post by projectvxn


Sorry man,but I have kids,and I had an ex,that let someone abuse my kids.

Hes lucky hes in Jail.

reply to post by OzTruth


This moral equivalence is ridiculous.

A thirteen year old girl does not have the same experience as a 40 year old man.

I guess we should do what the Romans once did and bugger little boys too?

Give me a break

reply to post by TsukiLunar

I dont know if Hippies = Pedophiles. It seems as if your the one with jumps in logic

Way to miss the forest for the trees.

If a group of people can simply decide to come at you and deny you the 'right' to live, own property, etc - for any random reason they come up with... what stops them from taking: "We don't like pedophiles and think they should be killed" and turn it into: "We don't like bankers, and think they should be killed?"

Why not? Many think a number of the bankers out there are breaking laws and cheating people out of money. Doesn't take a massive leap of logic.

On the other hand - I can point out the more liberal element, who tend to collect government subsidies for standards of living and call them moral and ethical cheats.

You can turn around and call me a moral and ethical cheat for not thinking another person has a right to a standard of living to be provided for by the society around him/her.

And so on. Before you know it, we're all cheats, cons, and the bane of someone's existence (groups like pedophiles are likely more universally disliked - but they are merely the catalyst and the precedent for going on door-to-door witch-hunts to satisfy some odd blood-lust).

It's called "mission creep" in the military: "We entered Vietnam to help teach the South Vietnamese how to operate an effective military resistance against the communist North Vietnam... one thing led to another... and we kicked off Operation Rolling Thunder for one of the largest bombing campaigns in history."

Mobs are, notoriously, worse at keeping mission creep under control.

Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by OzTruth

 

Would you have shot Elvis too? He met Priscilla when she was 14?

Well, its not pedophilia when she reaches puberty, is it? 14 is even legal in some countries.

Technically you are correct, so why is everyone shocked if someone likes them that young. Because it takes me alot more than that to be shocked. And why do people get sent to jail for viewing or possessing pics of girls 13-18. Bit of a double standard to you think?? If it's ok for Elvis why not the rest of them??

reply to post by projectvxn


The moral equivalence isn't ridiculous. Humanity and morality was the same then as it is now. so give me a break, to say you would shoot them and use them as target practise, is just as inhumane as pedophilia. So did you just admit it was ok back then in 1880's?? And not now??

Originally posted by OzTruth
reply to post by projectvxn

 

The moral equivalence isn't ridiculous. Humanity and morality was the same then as it is now. so give me a break, to say you would shoot them and use them as target practise, is just as inhumane as pedophilia. So did you just admit it was ok back then in 1880's?? And not now??

Why does it matter?

We don't live in the 1880s. Why are you trying to ascribe moral qualification to pedophilia/ephebophilia just because it was ok then?

reply to post by projectvxn


However, in all fairness, I think 14-over is something different than pedophilia.

Here is how wikipedia defines pedophilia

As a medical diagnosis, pedophilia (or paedophilia) is defined as a psychiatric disorder in adults or late adolescents (persons age 16 or older) typically characterized by a primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children (generally age 13 years or younger, though onset of puberty may vary)

en.wikipedia.org...

And this is 15-over

Ephebophilia is the sexual preference of adults for mid-to-late adolescents, generally ages 15 to 19

en.wikipedia.org...

reply to post by projectvxn


I haven't said anywhere that pedophilia was or is moral? Far out seriously dude. You just said it was ok in 1880's again. For someone against pedophilia, let me remind you it's not ok now and shouldn't have been ok then. Just keep your AR15 on safety and worry about your own backyard. Pedophilia has been apart of US history that is a reality you have to live with. It's never been ok or moral

Originally posted by OzTruth
reply to post by projectvxn

 

I haven't said anywhere that pedophilia was or is moral? Far out seriously dude. You just said it was ok in 1880's again. For someone against pedophilia, let me remind you it's not ok now and shouldn't have been ok then. Just keep your AR15 on safety and worry about your own backyard. Pedophilia has been apart of US history that is a reality you have to live with. It's never been ok or moral

Ok, so what is your point?

You make a silly straw man argument based on the fact that Elvis got together with a 14 year old, and then you try to qualify it by saying that it happened in the 1880s and some how I'm supposed to be ok with it all because it's part of history?

WTF are you going on about?

http:///88Lzs1XR

Those arent real name they revealed, its just user names.

I wanna see some real names for these sickos.

Originally posted by TsukiLunar
http:///88Lzs1XR

Those arent real name they revealed, its just user names.

I wanna see some real names for these sickos.

That's gonna be much harder to do.

There's layers of encryption and packet distribution to wade through.
I don't think Anon has those capabilities. And even if they do it's gonna take forever.

reply to post by OzTruth

Technically you are correct, so why is everyone shocked if someone likes them that young.

Its not about who likes them, because every healthy normal human naturally likes the opposite sex from puberty onwards, not magically from 18 years of age. Yet the limit is set at 18 because thats when young people are judged capable of consenting to produce porn.

You wont find morality in nature.

That said, 13-18 is a grey area, and I would not necessarily disagree if the laws were changed to be less restricting in this age range.

reply to post by Maslo


13?

Just because the parts are there doesn't mean the mind is.

reply to post by sonnny1

Do you have Children?

I do.

Thank God Anonymous found them,instead of me.

What does that have to do with anything?

If someone is in the act of abusing a kid around me, I will do what is necessary to expedite the ceasing of said abuse. That may include the application of lethal force (it can be ... rationalized ... using the criteria for the use of deadly force - but it's not a freebie).

If someone is not currently in the act of doing something that puts someone at risk - I cannot justify using any force beyond what is necessary to perform a citizen's arrest - if that is appropriate.

As for my kids - I will do my best to teach them right from wrong, arts of self-defense, and do my best to keep them out of comprising situations.

You cannot, however, use "I have kids" to try and make an emotional appeal to justify your standpoint. It simply doesn't work. I've younger family members I would sacrifice untold amounts for. Dying doesn't even really describe it... that's a cop-out... once you're dead, there's no longer anything you can do - you've taken yourself out of the equation and left people behind. Similarly - I've had junior students and neighbors several years my junior whom I would risk life and limb for.... some of them, I'd do more for them than their parents would.

I'm sure my own children will hold a place in my life that no other beings can - but I can assure you, it will not change my position on this issue. There is a time for violence, and a time for strategy. Justice is rarely served at the hands of the angry.

Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by Maslo

 

13?

Just because the parts are there doesn't mean the mind is.

Yes, thats my point..

Well, given that the Police are too busy harassing civilians instead of catching criminals,
I say it was about time someone did something about it. Way to go Anon!

Originally posted by Ben81

Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by Pirateofpsychonautics

 

My AR15 is hungry.

give me one
and lets go raid those pedos home one by one
until this filthy species is instict

edit on 10/25/2011 by Ben81 because: (no reason given)

I'd work voluntarily as a vigilante pedophile executioner.