reply to post by anoncoholic
I firmly believe something is up with the Pentagon and consequently with the whole of 9/11.
In some recent posts I've tried to think through and dissect the scene. I know the Pentagon pre and post crash scene was 'staged'. It's obvious to
me. So now I got to figure out exactly how. But because I am personally convinced there is staging at the Pentagon scene I'm already over the hump
the 9/11 physics guys face saying the towers couldn't fall that way or some outside energy must have been used etc.
I've concluded something is fishy and the Pentagon is my way in.
And of course, by extension, I'm willing to bet there's something fishy at every 9/11 scene. I hardly think if there be 'staging' planning at the
Pentagon, then there wouldn't also be the same everywhere we look. You're not going to stage the Pentagon scene and leave the complete destruction
of the towers and WTC 7 up to just luck, randomness and gravity chance.
As well, I hardly think the "terrorists" planned the post crash Pentagon scene.
I've talked about the witnesses and how none of them mentioned the smoke trail under the plane as it scooted diagonally across the entire lawn from
the highway to the wall impact. (I'm referencing that animated Solidworks video with the smoke trail shown under the right engine.) Many many of
these witnesses did though, mention seeing a plane. But still, the early photos show no 757 lawn wreckage really. And there was a smoke streak on the
gate cam video (Solidworks animation) that no witnesses even mentioned.
I spent a post going on about the gate cam/smoke trail but the thing is, the OSers will say like, "How can you not take the witnesses seriously? You
calling them all agents or liars?!" Well sure they seen a plane see, but yet, there is really no wreckage of a 757 apparent on the lawn. So what does
that mean? That the witnesses seem to be indicating that the photos with a lack of plane parts are phony? Or is it the other way around? That the lack
of plane parts in the photos means the witnesses are mistaken, lying or are all government agents?! Which is it?
Another thing I want to add is the smoking generator in the construction area, it is suspicious in its placement and activity on 9/11, smoking away
there on the lawn. It is presumed it was hit by something that came in just above the wire spools but not above the corner of the generator, catching
it on fire. That's all highly suspect to me. Not the least of which it being hit in a way it would smoke the way it did. I find it and its activity
highly questionable because it was hit the way it supposedly was, leading me to think that it was set and not really accidently hit by whatever may
have scooted across the lawn.
With me so far? Ok.
I been thinking about all the witnesses seeing planes and all the TV Fakery Theories. Clearly that all gets shot down because many many people saw
planes on 9/11 with their own eyes, there are countless street witnesses and even people in here who say like, "My cousin, brother, ex wife, all seen
planes on 9/11!" And again the Pentagon witnesses claim this as well. Even though the early Pentagon photos don't seem to contain what you would
expect. As well, we are all aware of the lack of Pentagon video footage etc. And in NYC weren't the black boxes destroyed and not recovered?
Interesting. For I mean, how can you have eye witness reports of planes and no plane pic wreckage? Or video and eye witness account plane impacts and
no black boxes?
I'm not one for Live TV Fakery or CGI, I just think that would be too hard and even too obvious, right? I mean if it could be proved some clip is
truly fake then everything would quickly unravel. You agree? That's way too many media people to involve. So I personally do not believe in fake
video or CGI planes. Further to that I think those witnesses, either at the Pentagon or in New Jersey or the streets of Manhattan that saw planes did
indeed see planes. I think the news videos shot that day seen planes too and that no big video fakery is afoot. It would be too risky to leave the
crime of the century secrecy to some idiot TV producer or film maker editor. Am i right?
No, people saw planes that day. But does that mean I think the Pentagon photos that show no plane are phony? No, not in that way. Rather than pit one
thing against the other I'm taking a third path, one that thinks the witnesses are telling the truth and that as well, the early Pentagon lawn photos
also tell the truth. Same with the towers and there being no black boxes...
That people saw planes on 9/11 is abundantly clear to me. I don't think regular people were lying or that the videos were faked... no, not at all.