It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Dr Kiyul Chung: “I believe the world is now at a historic crossroads,” Dr Kiyul Chung told RT. “Or some may say the world is at the brink of either being subdued or overcoming the US/NATO military intervention in Libya, [which is] now moving possibly to Syria or even to Iran, if Russia and China, or [the] Shanghai Co-operation Organization are [too] weak to stop US-led NATO military aggression in [the] North African region So I hope Russia and China [can] lead this new global movement to balance the power in the world, so they can build new world order where no more unilateral, aggressive or even colonial methodology [is] being put into a sovereign nation such as Libya.”
“China-Russia trade and economic relationship and huge development between the two nations, I believe, is not only impacting the European continent, but also the global scene,” added Dr Kiyul Chung. “This economic and trade relationship is not limited only to economy, it is also a strategic relationship. So, it is going to have a huge impact on the world.”
reply to post by Griffo515
So I hope Russia and China [can] lead this new global movement to balance the power in the world, so they can build new world order where no more unilateral, aggressive or even colonial methodology [is] being put into a sovereign nation such as Libya.”
Originally posted by quedup
Thanks for sharing.
RT News is the closest you get to the truth and the only news channel that has covered the OWS protesters in a fair and balanced way.
The Keiser Report is always very enlightening!
The only News Channel I watch!
Good Find Op! S&F
Originally posted by AllUrChips
So all of a sudden a chineese political scientist is the be all end all of the world? For one NATO would absolutely CRUSH china and russia. Thier millitary is not as up to date as ours plus the sheer numbers of countries they would be facing would not be an easy fight for them. Basically it would be N.korea, venezuela, china, russia, VS. Everyone else
I didnt add iran to this equation because they will cease to exist as a country at the start of WW3edit on 17-10-2011 by AllUrChips because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Griffo515
Originally posted by AllUrChips
So all of a sudden a chineese political scientist is the be all end all of the world? For one NATO would absolutely CRUSH china and russia. Thier millitary is not as up to date as ours plus the sheer numbers of countries they would be facing would not be an easy fight for them. Basically it would be N.korea, venezuela, china, russia, VS. Everyone else
I didnt add iran to this equation because they will cease to exist as a country at the start of WW3edit on 17-10-2011 by AllUrChips because: (no reason given)
So winning a war is all about how "up to date" your military is?? Have you forgotten about Vietnam? Not to mention the US is financially broke, the people WILL NOT back another war.
Originally posted by Krzyzmo
There is another option
The world against the bankers
Everybody wins, except the bankersedit on 17-10-2011 by Krzyzmo because: added on
Originally posted by AllUrChips
We didnt get to be the most powerful country by not being the smartest.
Originally posted by Griffo515
Originally posted by AllUrChips
We didnt get to be the most powerful country by not being the smartest.
Well your definitely correct there my friend.
And YES the United States of America is financially BROKE. For you see, when you have to borrow money because you have none yourself...that makes you out of pocket! You cannot repay a debt by waging war on money you dont own!