It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Hate to say it mate but your logic is completely silly and ridiculous (correct spelling). I appreciate the time you put into your responses, though obviously we cannot see eye to eye here. Thanks anyway
Evidence = found relevant & credible in court.. until then, they're "allegations".
1930s Germans had more faith in political party leaders current words.. than past govt deeds.
Name ONE govt in the history of govts where trusting politicians worked out for the best?
Governments are known for spinning reality into war.. dear leaders of the GOP & DNC mafioso sent 70,000+ Americans to their death based on the Gulf of Tonkin lie.. millions suffered.
At best this plot is one guy allegedly planning to kill another guy.. with Federal agents guidance.. ooohh soccer moms beware.
Originally posted by areyouserious2010
reply to post by GovtFlu
Again, show me concrete evidence that the Gulf of Tonkin was a lie.
Robert Hanyok declares his review of all the intelligence shows beyond doubt that "no attack happened that night"
This is not a regular case of conspiracy to commit murder. The murder is motivated by a foreign government towards a foreign national to make a political statement or sway political policy. That makes it assassination. And the federal agents did not "guide" the guy. The guy's intent was to complete this act, the federal agents simply allowed him to perpetrate the act to a certain extent, showing his intent, so that evidence and FACTS could be uncovered and so he could be prosecuted.
This is not a regular case of conspiracy to commit murder. The murder is motivated by a foreign government towards a foreign national to make a political statement or sway political policy. That makes it assassination. And the federal agents did not "guide" the guy. The guy's intent was to complete this act, the federal agents simply allowed him to perpetrate the act to a certain extent, showing his intent, so that evidence and FACTS could be uncovered and so he could be prosecuted.
Originally posted by KrazyJethro
I've got to be honest with you guys, but I have serious doubts that this is the level of sophistication a nation of our resources would put out as a plausible lie, evidence or not. I mean, if it's as silly and stupid as you say it is, why bother even putting it together?
Its pretty much taken as a given by most that Tonkin was one of the first false flags used to go to war. Do a search for more information on the subject if you require. Theres lots out there.
There is no evidence period. Just allegations that are being acted upon. Every second word in the report was alleged. Innocent until proven guilty?
At the end of the day this guy is still born in America and living in America. Anything he is convicted of cant be used to go to war with another country.
Iran simply isnt stupid. Their borders are closed, tensions with the US are high, Why on earth would they hire an American to organize an assassination for them?