The Killshot, page 2

privacy

Pages: << 1 2 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times

reply posted on 8-10-2011 @ 11:23 AM by yoesse

Yea, Ed Dames. Dr Doom. He's always got a new fresh perspective on how we're all gonna die.

I can't believe I went back and watched the whole thing.

edit on 8-10-2011 by yoesse because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 8-10-2011 @ 10:37 PM by stereologist

Remote viewing is not real. It has never passed a real test in experimental conditions. The success of RV lies in arguing after the fact that the vague statements made by the viewing are a hit.

When pressed for a test the viewer claims they cannot do such specific things as determine what is a box even if given a list to choose from such as rock, apple, chair, etc. Yet when do they a test they all report amazingly spot on viewings. In a rather long winded discussion with one remote viewer he tried to claim that music, singing, swaying rhythmically with Sun and heat and dry throats was a spot on description of a tornado in Arkansas.

I say self deluded.

reply posted on 20-10-2011 @ 07:56 AM by truthseekr1111

Originally posted by DrumminDude
reply to post by Victor03

ELENIN was a distraction Vic, you know that. Come on now. It is what is coming a few month behind elenin that you have to worry about.

Think dude, why are world governments preparing by building shelters and buying tons of food, water, gold, you name it. Follow the money, it always leads to what is going on. Those who could afford to the past 8 years or so have sent up tons of INFRARED equipment to view this binary twin, in the south pole, Chile, even Arizona. Why does the VATICAN have an infrared telescope named Lucifer on Mount Graham in AZ? They also know what is coming that is why.

Don't let the deniers tell you that all is well, those folks are only half awake if at all. They are not shills most likely, just in denial or plain scared. No one can deny that the Earth and our whole solar system is being tweaked by something big and heavy. No doubt.

YES...exactly... but you're half right.. The object is now "parked" up between Neptune & Uranus around or inside the kuiper.

So the 38 day behind theory is on "hold" or hiatus til "they" make a "decision" which way to direct it and it begins a new "cycle".

So what those in the KNOW learned based on that info, is the OBJECT and theory was and is REAL and was in fact approaching up until Sept 15th which just happened to be when we had the 7.3 quake in FIJI and end of a record 2 week massive quake swarm of elenin alignments that abruptly ended after the 15th with a massive LULL in activity from that date forward and actually, in fact NO large quakes at all during any "elenin" alignments since then.

Skeptics laugh and say "see, it was all just coincidence" and nothing happened on the 27th ... ohhhhh okkkaay.

coincidence that every time there was an elenin alignment, large & significant to the most powerful quakes on record ALWAYS occurred for years during any "elenin" alignment up until the 15th and then all alignments after that have had zero activity???

Yeeeeeah suuure

reply posted on 20-10-2011 @ 08:12 AM by jjkenobi

Don't know if it's just me or not but all the videos say they were removed due to copyright infringement. I did hear the show on C2C and found it interesting.

reply posted on 20-10-2011 @ 08:26 AM by stereologist

reply to post by truthseekr1111

YES...exactly... but you're half right.. The object is now "parked" up between Neptune & Uranus around or inside the kuiper.

The Kuiper belt is not close to the known planets. Please look up the Kuiper belt and find out why your statement is way off base.

So what those in the KNOW learned based on that info, is the OBJECT and theory was and is REAL and was in fact approaching up until Sept 15th which just happened to be when we had the 7.3 quake in FIJI and end of a record 2 week massive quake swarm of elenin alignments that abruptly ended after the 15th with a massive LULL in activity from that date forward and actually, in fact NO large quakes at all during any "elenin" alignments since then.

There were no significant quakes on the Elenin alignments. That claim is as odd as the mix up you have with the planets and the location of the Kuiper belt.

coincidence that every time there was an elenin alignment, large & significant to the most powerful quakes on record ALWAYS occurred for years during any "elenin" alignment up until the 15th and then all alignments after that have had zero activity???

People fudged the data. Or more correctly the people that made the alignment claims lied.

reply posted on 24-10-2011 @ 03:51 PM by truthseekr1111

Originally posted by stereologist
post by truthseekr1111

YES...exactly... but you're half right.. The object is now "parked" up between Neptune & Uranus around or inside the kuiper.
The Kuiper belt is not close to the known planets. Please look up the Kuiper belt and find out why your statement is way off base.

So what those in the KNOW learned based on that info, is the OBJECT and theory was and is REAL and was in fact approaching up until Sept 15th which just happened to be when we had the 7.3 quake in FIJI and end of a record 2 week massive quake swarm of elenin alignments that abruptly ended after the 15th with a massive LULL in activity from that date forward and actually, in fact NO large quakes at all during any "elenin" alignments since then.
There were no significant quakes on the Elenin alignments.

Uh, Yes there was.

Originally posted by stereologist
That claim is as odd as the mix up you have with the planets and the location of the Kuiper belt.

to those using conventional science, okay sure.

coincidence that every time there was an elenin alignment, large & significant to the most powerful quakes on record ALWAYS occurred for years during any "elenin" alignment up until the 15th and then all alignments after that have had zero activity???
People fudged the data. Or more correctly the people that made the alignment claims lied.

Unless you can show evidence to support that claim, your opinion is meaningless.

But then if even one "syzygy" as its defined by conventional science for all intents and purposes or particular orbital positioning of Elenin with 2 other objects can be correlated to major quakes, let alone a repeated pattern, your entire premise fails.

edit on 24-10-2011 by truthseekr1111 because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 24-10-2011 @ 04:02 PM by stereologist

reply to post by truthseekr1111

to those using conventional science, okay sure.

So you are using unconventional science, i.e. falsehoods? I agree with that. You are making stuff up that makes no sense.

Unless you can show evidence to support that claim, your opinion is meaningless.

In several Elenin threads I showed that the alignment was 5 days after the March 11 quake. The alignment claims were based on falsifying the data.

But then if even one "syzygy" as its defined by conventional science for all intents and purposes or particular orbital positioning of Elenin with 2 other objects can be correlated to major quakes, let alone a repeated pattern, your entire premise fails.

Science does not bother with alignments. That is for astrologers and other charlatans to toy with.

The alignment quake data was a lie. You fell for the lie. You are welcome to show that any alignments happened on the claimed days. Go ahead and knock yourself out. I'm pretty sure that you saw that in all of the Elenin threads already and are simply being a troll.

reply posted on 24-10-2011 @ 04:10 PM by Xcalibur254

reply to post by truthseekr1111

For every "alignment" Elenin was below the ecliptic making any kind of actual alignment impossible. Then there's also the fact that better "alignments" occurred on days different from the earthquakes. For example the Japan earthquake. The earthquake occurred on March 11, the so-called alignment didn't occur until March 15. This then lead to people claiming such things like earthquakes will occur within the three days before or after an alignment, which shows that the "alignments" meant nothing as odds are on at least one 6.0+ earthquake occurring during that time period.

Pages: << 1 2 >> ^^TOP^^