It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by chr0naut
reply to post by yourmamaknows
A little Googling found...
Nibiru Final Update (PDF) was written by members of the Paltalk Elenin/Dwarf Star Research Group, including Terral Croft, Dr. Byron Glenn and others.
Originally posted by yourmamaknows
Originally posted by chr0naut
reply to post by yourmamaknows
A little Googling found...
Nibiru Final Update (PDF) was written by members of the Paltalk Elenin/Dwarf Star Research Group, including Terral Croft, Dr. Byron Glenn and others.
Wait a minute. There seems to be a problem here. The poster that I responded to on the GLP website was a girl and kinda interested in historical writings on the subject. Does she fit in with your research?---------------
Originally posted by LightAssassin
reply to post by yourmamaknows
'Vatican' based???
Bahahahahahahahahaahah. Like the Vatican would release that. That's the funniest thing I've read all day.
Hyperresonator equations do not simply challenge, but immediately invalidate both Einstein's General Relativity and Planck's Quantum Physics theory as fundamentally flawed. Newton’s assumption on constancy of G, and the faked "physical units" he attached thereupon to G only in order to close his theory physically as well as mathematically, have made his theory obviously flawed to begin with.
Originally posted by visualmiscreant
reply to post by chr0naut
I tried a little search myself, and found this interview with a Dr. Mensur Omerbashich. Perhaps this is where the group got their idea about the gravity question. Not sure if this has been debunked...
Hyperresonator equations do not simply challenge, but immediately invalidate both Einstein's General Relativity and Planck's Quantum Physics theory as fundamentally flawed. Newton’s assumption on constancy of G, and the faked "physical units" he attached thereupon to G only in order to close his theory physically as well as mathematically, have made his theory obviously flawed to begin with.
Just trying to help. This interview comes up in a search for Terral Croft.
Interview
And here's the paper
Astronomical Alignments/Cornell University Library
Originally posted by Angelicdefender2012
Originally posted by visualmiscreant
reply to post by chr0naut
I tried a little search myself, and found this interview with a Dr. Mensur Omerbashich. Perhaps this is where the group got their idea about the gravity question. Not sure if this has been debunked...
Hyperresonator equations do not simply challenge, but immediately invalidate both Einstein's General Relativity and Planck's Quantum Physics theory as fundamentally flawed. Newton’s assumption on constancy of G, and the faked "physical units" he attached thereupon to G only in order to close his theory physically as well as mathematically, have made his theory obviously flawed to begin with.
Just trying to help. This interview comes up in a search for Terral Croft.
Interview
And here's the paper
Astronomical Alignments/Cornell University Library
Here is another theory or possible hypothesis.........according to R.S. Herrington and P.K. Seidelmann from the U.S. Naval Observatory.....
paragraph 10 of 14 at this link states:
That the it could be do to the incompleteness of our knowledge or application, of the theory of relativity or the univeral law of gravity. there is an old question concerning gravitational effects: Are the effects instantaneous like a field effect or is there a time delay proportionate to the distance? This has been considered a settled issue in favor of field effect, but recent evidence from precise earth-based measurements has reopened this issue.
www.bibliotecapleyades.net...
And this article OP is referring sounds dangerously similar to R.S. Harringtons research. So maybe that is where it came from.
yowusa.com...
Originally posted by visualmiscreant
reply to post by chr0naut
Good deal, but not what I was implying. I simply meant that whomever wrote the "update", may have misinterpreted the interview, possibly drawing from something they didn't fully understand. Like I said, the page came up in a search for Mr. Croft. I realize I was grasping at straws, but I haven't had time to do a decent search.
I too am interested in negating/affirming information in the "update", because it's implications are not good. If we're in the boat that suspects NASA is hiding something, all we have are bits and pieces from amateurs and whatever professionals might leak here and there. A complete and accurate report may never be available. Has anyone turned up anymore information about this thing?