posted on Sep, 27 2011 @ 08:30 AM
People, think. Obama is going to drop a nuclear weapon because he'll lose either oil (which he wants) or campaign funding (which he already has $1
billion)? Seriously, c'mon.
1. Obama needs clean energy to succeed. This was a major platform for him, the whole Solyndra thing debacle needs to be replaced with success, etc.
So, since increasing taxes on fossil fuels in order to make them comparative to clean energy is political suicide because everybody's broke....what
better way to make clean energy a forced buy than to eliminate the amount of oil we import because we tick off the entire middle East with a veto.
2. Obama has already lost the Jewish vote the minute those pesky "1967" border verbiage came out of his mouth. I am not here to debate what he
meant by it, but it matters not....mentioning Israel and those borders together in a sentence was enough to mark him anti-Israel in the eyes of the
Jewish population IMO.
3. The man has a billion dollar coffer to campaign with....he doesn't need anymore funding and is fully aware of that fact.
Frankly, I would be watching something else entirely. I believe there will be another instigated crisis, but no nuclear weapons...that's just
ridiculous. At least not from us.
Remember the whole US Embassy attack yesterday? We are going after Pakistan. Why? Because Iran is tied to Pakistan and once we start that fight,
the US will "prove" that Iran is supporting the Pakistan side and then we will go after Iran. It is the best method to attacking Iran without going
directly after them.
The US wants Iran, but it also knows that it can not merely drop a bomb on it without Iran throwing the first punch. Which won't happen because Iran
is smart enough to use pawns. Iran will not directly give the IAEA, or the world, any reason whatsoever to question the legitimacy of their nuclear
The goal, in my opinion, is Iran.