let's disect the protocols one at a time and see if they're true

Originally posted by patternfinder

Here, everything is presented as fiction. It would be superfluous to give the key to it in advance. If this book has significance, if it conceals a teaching, the reader must understand it himself and not have it explained to him. Moreover, reading this will not be without its lively pleasures. Still, one must proceed slowly through it as befits writings that are not about frivolous matters. No one should ask whose hand wrote these pages. In a certain sense, a work like this is anonymous. It answers a call to conscience. Everyone hears this call. The ideas take form. The author withdraws to the background because he merely records a thought that is generally held. He is merely a more or less obscure in strument of the partisans who seek the good.

he explains that he is not the author of the ideas behind this book, he is just presenting it as fiction so that it might be accepted and understood better than the plain text.....

Right...it's a political tract against Napoleon III. He was trying to be careful so that he wouldn't get arrested and possibly killed for saying the things he said. Turns out he did get imprisoned for it and the book was banned in France...

Originally posted by OhZone

Originally posted by cripmeister
reply to post by patternfinder

 

The Protocols of Zion is an anti-semitic fabrication. The source in your OP is an anti-semitic website.

If you had read this thread and pursued the links I provided you would see that we are saying that it really has nothing to do with Jews per se.
You may further become aware that Jews of today are NOT Semites; so your whole "anti-semetic" accusation is and oxy-moron.

Your interpretation does not change the fact that The Protocols was published to scapegoat the Jewish people in Russia and to discredit the Bolsheviks (many of them were Jewish). Only anti-semits and the ignorant think it has any relevance today.

reply to post by LifeInDeath

What is the point of trying to find the truth or lies in a document's text if the document was a fraud and a forgery in the first place?

You are assuming that the protocols are not older than they appear.

You are assuming that their release in the 20th century was the first attempted release of the information contained therein.

You are assuming that they were copied from the Dialogues, as opposed to the Dialogues being an attempt to release information about the Protocols.

This Video is Relevant:

The pilot episode for the FOX series "The Lone Gunmen" Which first aired on March 4, 2001

Just Saying.

ok, guys, this thread isn't about just saying that the protocols are a hoax, this thread is about actually disecting the protocols and seeing what is in them.....it isn't about maurice jolly or his book.......please, let's get back on track here and pick out parts of the protocols that i have provided and tell me if the statements are true or false....