This topic is in the Ancient & Lost Civilizations discussion forum.  (rss)


Pedro the mystery mummy.




Topic started on 24-8-2004 @ 06:32 PM by phantompatriot


www.anomalies-unlimited.com...

This mummy is not fully human.it was discovered in the san pedro mountains of whyoming in 1932. anyways it died because of blunt force trauma. maybe it was an alien or something strange and it spooked the indians so the hit it on the head with a log. But i think the Indians were well aware of aliens and maybe befriended them.

EDIT: for other archeological mysteries go here:
www.anomalies-unlimited.com...



[edit on 24-8-2004 by phantompatriot]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-8-2004 @ 06:52 PM by ZeddicusZulZorander


This has been posted before.

There is probably nothing on that site that hasn't.
Try the SEARCH



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-8-2004 @ 06:57 PM by phantompatriot


can you refer me to the thread. i couldn't find it using search.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-8-2004 @ 07:01 PM by asala


Think these may be something to do with it,


www.abovetopsecret.com...



www.abovetopsecret.com...

Hope they help some what.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-8-2004 @ 07:26 PM by phantompatriot


thank you asala! this conflabbit search is so conflabbit and confusing. thanks



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-8-2004 @ 07:34 PM by SE7EN


This might seem a bit of topic but i found this while in my local store and then posted it up on here hope its of use to you.SE7EN ATS UFO



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-8-2004 @ 08:43 PM by Nygdan


The only actually strange thing I find about this whole situation, is that the thing was 14 inches tall. Otherwise it was a perfectly normal human apparently. Where are the Natural History Musuem records, to verify the height? Does anyone know if there was a report printed about it?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-8-2004 @ 08:49 PM by phantompatriot


Im not sure because it was Stolen, it was discovered in 1932 but there should be. I find just about everything about it strange.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-8-2004 @ 09:18 PM by Nygdan



Originally posted by phantompatriot
Im not sure because it was Stolen, it was discovered in 1932 but there should be. I find just about everything about it strange.


The item is missing yes, but if the Museum Of natural history did xrays and examined the thing there should be a report



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Find More:





Top Topics Right Now:






Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:

















ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

, , ,
















ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.080 seconds
Page processed in 0.097 seconds
8 total database queries (2)









( The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC. )





thread