It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Pedro the mystery mummy.

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 24 2004 @ 06:32 PM
link   
www.anomalies-unlimited.com...

This mummy is not fully human.it was discovered in the san pedro mountains of whyoming in 1932. anyways it died because of blunt force trauma. maybe it was an alien or something strange and it spooked the indians so the hit it on the head with a log. But i think the Indians were well aware of aliens and maybe befriended them.

EDIT: for other archeological mysteries go here:
www.anomalies-unlimited.com...



[edit on 24-8-2004 by phantompatriot]




posted on Aug, 24 2004 @ 06:52 PM
link   
This has been posted before.

There is probably nothing on that site that hasn't.
Try the SEARCH



posted on Aug, 24 2004 @ 06:57 PM
link   
can you refer me to the thread. i couldn't find it using search.



posted on Aug, 24 2004 @ 07:01 PM
link   
Think these may be something to do with it,


www.abovetopsecret.com...



www.abovetopsecret.com...

Hope they help some what.



posted on Aug, 24 2004 @ 07:26 PM
link   
thank you asala! this conflabbit search is so conflabbit and confusing.
thanks



posted on Aug, 24 2004 @ 07:34 PM
link   
This might seem a bit of topic but i found this while in my local store and then posted it up on here hope its of use to you.SE7EN ATS UFO



posted on Aug, 25 2004 @ 08:43 PM
link   
The only actually strange thing I find about this whole situation, is that the thing was 14 inches tall. Otherwise it was a perfectly normal human apparently. Where are the Natural History Musuem records, to verify the height? Does anyone know if there was a report printed about it?



posted on Aug, 25 2004 @ 08:49 PM
link   
Im not sure because it was Stolen, it was discovered in 1932 but there should be. I find just about everything about it strange.



posted on Aug, 25 2004 @ 09:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by phantompatriot
Im not sure because it was Stolen, it was discovered in 1932 but there should be. I find just about everything about it strange.


The item is missing yes, but if the Museum Of natural history did xrays and examined the thing there should be a report



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join