It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Abortion is a woman’s choice and does not concern the state
Recognizing that abortion is a sensitive issue and that libertarians can hold good-faith views on both sides, we believe the government should be kept out of the question. We condemn state-funded abortions. It is particularly harsh to force someone who believes that abortion is murder to pay for another’s abortion. It is the right of the woman, not the state, to decide the desirability of prenatal testing, Caesarean births, fetal surgery, and/or home births.
Source: National Platform of the Libertarian Party Jul 2, 2000
“If I were in Congress in 1996, I would have voted for the Defense of Marriage Act, which used Congress’s constitutional authority to define what official state documents other states have to recognize under the Full Faith and Credit Clause, to ensure that no state would be forced to recognize a “same sex” marriage license issued in another state.
Originally posted by Open_Minded Skeptic
So no, the libertarians are another dead end.
Originally posted by sonofliberty1776
we have liberal whiners complaining about noisy wind turbines, or tortoise environments getting disrupted by solar panels, or snail darters adversely affected by dams.
Originally posted by jtap66
Most people who claim to be Libertarians are just Republicans seeking to re-brand themselves. They still vote Republican in every election, which is about the furthest thing from Libertarianism that I can imagine. They hate big government, yet vote for a party that IS big government, no matter how much they claim they aren't to their deluded base.
If Ron Paul was really a Libertarian, he would run as one.
I respect your decision. The thing is, you'll never find even a candidate, much less a party, that you'll be in 100% agreement with. There's a quote somewhere about if you find a person with whom you agree 100% of the time, only one of you is thinking.
Originally posted by filosophia
So you don't like republicans, or democrats, or Ron Paul. How about Cynthia McKinney, green party activist?
So you're saying military killing is wrong, and Ron Paul wants to end the wars, and that's still wrong?
Bottom line therefore is that the society of “welfarism” and “socialism” that Ron Paul so contemptuously abhors, most likely ended up absorbing the remaining $372,000 of his former campaign manager’s unpaid medical bills because neither he nor his church, friends or neighbours could fully account for them. Go figure.
This seems to be the problem with the libertarian doctrine… their theoretical notions of individual “freedom” often don’t translate well into real world experience. In other words, when the rubber meets the road, it turns out they’re woefully impractical.
Originally posted by Open_Minded Skeptic
I believe foreign military adventurism, as practiced by the US largely since the end of WWII is wrong.