It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Raelsatu
Just finished watching the live coverage of the debate, and I entered without any bias (well for the most part).
I was actually slightly impressed with most of the answers coming from the candidates, minus the fact that most of them were parroting Ron Pauls policies. The only candidate I was extremely underwhelmed by is Rick Perry. He was on the defense nearly the entire time, and didn't do justice to any of the questions. Shame that he was given so much time.
Gingrich and Santorum answered well, except for the question on foreign policy and 9/11. I loath Santorum for the way he demagogued.
Ron Paul did exceptional, although he wasn't given much speaking time in comparison to Perry/Romney (both of which I was underwhelmed by). Paul handled the response regarding 9/11 how it should of been yet some braindead drones in the audience booed him.
That's my analysis for now.
I can't (ok I can) believe some of the questions he's been asked the last 2 weeks. "Would you let a child go without a school lunch?" "Would you let the uninsured man DIE?"
Originally posted by RoswellCityLimits
reply to post by Raelsatu
No, I'm suggesting that, since he's made a living off of politics for a decade+...he's not to be trusted. Period. Especially a career republican, or democrat...ANY career crimin...er...I mean, Politician.
Y'all need to stop fluffing Ron Paul's junk, too. Seriously.
Originally posted by RoswellCityLimits
reply to post by Raelsatu
No, I'm suggesting that, since he's made a living off of politics for a decade+...he's not to be trusted. Period. Especially a career republican, or democrat...ANY career crimin...er...I mean, Politician.
Y'all need to stop fluffing Ron Paul's junk, too. Seriously.