big headline: TEA PARTY BOOS PAUL, page 2

I have been learning a little about the "neocon" movement. Just enough to get into trouble talking about them. There is something pretty deep going on there. I see mentions of Zionism connected with the movement. And I see this "Santorum" guy (is that a wild name, or what? In Latin it means "saints.") talking about "American excellence." What the heck is going on here?

I think we are seeing the effects of the real chaos merchants in the background whispering different stories in different people's ears. Everyone gets a story that feeds best into their own prejudices. Then they go out and argue with each other about it like the stories they are being told are the solid truth and the other guy is just so wrong.

We would prefer to believe that these candidates know this is happening. But I don't think any of these guys do. What if all these guys think that the OTHERS are being misled by the enemy, when they are really ALL being mislead by the enemy?

NEOCONS: This group has been convinced for a long time that the United States is being threatened by an external enemy that is perfectly willing to do anything necessary, overt or covert, to take us down. They have targeted almost every ethnic group, in turn, as a potential threat and made life hell for the targeted groups whenever they got a chance. They believe in an aggressive, overt approach to this threat, but have a little trouble actually defining it. So they are suckered into supporting red flag operations that will justify their use of armed aggression. Their weakness is that armed force is not very effective or workable against a covert attack designed to infiltrate and undermine your country. Their strength is that such an attack does in fact exist, so they can make speeches that sound good.

OLD-LINE CONSERVATIVES: These can garner considerable public support because they can talk about the values of the founding fathers with sincerity and integrity. Unfortunately, the current power structure tends to ignore them or make fun of them for this same reason. They try to tell the truth, as they know it, about things, and the media just laughs at them. Their weakness is that they have been pushed off the "insider" information lines and can be easily tripped up by the spin doctors. Their strength is that most of them are still pretty sane. Some of them try to talk about the same attacks on American values that the Neocons talk about. But they have a hard time getting hard data about it and getting the word out, because the media are totally uncooperative.

OLD-LINE LIBERALS: Though not represented in the republican party, they are still numerous in the political field and probably get more attention from the chaos merchants than the old-line conservatives because they are easier to seduce. They try to live decent lives and promote decent public policy, but they have trouble with this. Their strength is in their tolerance. Their weakness is in their gullibility and their moral lapses.

THE NEW LIBERALS: Some would argue that these are just re-named Communists. The Communist Party of the US actually openly supports Obama for re-election. (Honest - you can look it up.) But I think it is a little more complicated than that. I don't think Obama thinks of himself as a Communist, or a Socialist or any of those other -ists he is accused of being. It's more like: He doesn't have a clue. These guys are picked out because they have personal secrets that they can be blackmailed for. Those are their main weaknesses. Their potential strength is that they could publicly appear to be going along with the enemy, but really aren't. Not much of a strength, now that I think about it. But it's the only one I can think of. They do not particularly value overt, aggressive strength like the Neocons do, so if they don't have some secret inner strength then they are pretty much out of luck.

Most of the rest of us would probably like one of the old-line types to rise up and take control. They seem more sincere. Some of us who are older look back fondly at the Kennedy years and see him as the last good example of a sincere President. But that perception could partly be due to how he was gotten rid of.

If things go "as planned" then a Neocon will rise to do battle with Obama in 2012. Of course, that will be a bit of a farce, as they both seem to be under the control of enemy groups. I haven't really established who those enemies are. But that's part of why this works. They all stand behind mirrors. And every time you look in their direction, you see yourself or someone else close by.

My Mother-In-Law is virtually endorsing Ron Paul!!!

I was informed tonight in a stunning report, that my mother-in-law is making her choice between Paul & Bachman.

This is important because she is the Lock-Step, GOP, Mainline, 9/11 Official Report!, Head in the sand, Bush is godlike, voter.

She also is the person that you talk to before you vote... NOT a Walmart greeter... Sweet older gal that gets you situated to vote at your polling place.

It's people like her, that you would never expect to come around.

Wow! There IS hope (not fraudulent hope.)

This is just FYI... Take it for what it's worth.