It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
TEHRAN, Iran - Iran said Sunday that it plans to build a second nuclear reactor with Russia's help and that at least two other European states have expressed interest in such a project, brushing aside U.S. accusations that the Islamic state wants to build atomic weapons.
Originally posted by Adam_S
I think that the second reactor will end like the first one
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Haha kool Iran can waste its money building its reactors cuz they are going to get blow to pieces by either Israel or the US There is no way Israel will let Iran have nuclear weapons not to mention Bush. So let Iran starve its people and waste its money cuz they will be destroyed anyway
[edit on 24-8-2004 by WestPoint23]
Originally posted by FredT
Persian, any idea why they are not persuing a reactor say further east and out of the range of Israel? Better to spread them out IMHO?If water is an issue why not on the caspian side of the Elbuz range?
Haha kool Iran can waste its money building its reactors cuz they are going to get blow to pieces by either Israel or the US There is no way Israel will let Iran have nuclear weapons not to mention Bush. So let Iran starve its people and waste its money cuz they will be destroyed anyway
Ever thought that just maybe these people understand their own supply problems when it comes to oil and realize that time may be running out and are actually planning unlike the ignorant people running our country? I mean who better to understand the supply than the supplier? We make fun of them and riddicule them because they just may be planning ahead. Perhaps the rest of the world should be laughing at us instead.
Originally posted by RealisticPatriot
Has any country, including our own thought up of ways to safely dispose of the nuclear waste? What will Iran do with the tons of nuclear waste it produces if it is in fact going to use the reactors for energy? What does any country do with it? In 3rd world nations such as india and pakistan the conatinment of nuclear waste is very poor and people in the surrounding towns suffer greatly. Having nuclear power is not important its what you do with it, and how you manage/handle it that counts. With nuclear power comes the responsibility to handle nuclear waste. Its funny though because even when you "responsibily" handle the waste you still are poisioning the earth or whatever. How much can we possibly store in the yucca mountains, and when thats filled, then what? I dont think nuclear power is the answer to diminishing oil reserves at all. If bush would have spent a 1/10th cost of the iraqi war on RnD for alternative energy, we would be close to a solution.
Originally posted by Shadowtrooper90
And we should. We should do what the Israelis did in the '70s with Iraq, and bomb that reactor into dust. That, with a total embargo, would make Iran think twice about pouring all its money into failed projects.
Originally posted by DarkSide
why should we bomb a nuclear REACTOR?
it's not like they were building missile's and pointing them on NY...
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
They dont need that reactor for energy, Iran is sitting untop of huge oil fields the world's second biggest oil field after Saudi Arabia's. You dont bring sand to the beach.
There only one other thing that a nuclear reactor is good for besides energy and it aint baking cookies.
Originally posted by persian
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
They dont need that reactor for energy, Iran is sitting untop of huge oil fields the world's second biggest oil field after Saudi Arabia's. You dont bring sand to the beach.
There only one other thing that a nuclear reactor is good for besides energy and it aint baking cookies.
Do you have a list to countries which are allowed to make atomic bomb and countries that are not allowed? I have been looking for that list for the long time now.